<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1982.tb00968.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>PANNENBERGS POLANYIANISM: A RESPONSE TO JOHN V. APCZYNSKI</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Foster</surname>
                  <given-names>Durwood</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1982-03-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>03</month>
            <year>1982</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>17</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1982.17.issue-1</issue-id>
         <fpage>75</fpage>
         <lpage>81</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  John V. Apczynski, while presenting a helpful analysis of Wolfhart Pannenberg and Michael Polanyi, does not succeed in showing that Pannenberg's theology is incoherent. Contrary to Apczynski, I hold that Pannenberg's concern for theoretic assertions is not extrinsic but intrinsic and central to his program. Moreover, this concern does not rest directly upon the cultural dominance of impersonal knowing but is a countering of the theological overreaction against it. Polanyi has pioneered the critique of impersonal knowledge, but in Pannenberg's judgment much theology tends to espouse too cheaply the Polanyian elevation of faith as ground of knowing. Pannenberg, while appreciating the relative justification of Polanyi's work, is attempting to thematize afresh—in interesting contrast to Polanyi and, for instance, Paul Tillich—the public, rational structure of faith.</p>
         </abstract>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <fn-group>
         <fn id="fn1">
            <label>1</label>
            <p>. John V. Apczynski, “Truth in Religion: A Polanyian Appraisal of Wolfhart Pannenberg's Theological Program,” in this issue, p. 60.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn2">
            <label>2</label>
            <p>. Ibid.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn3">
            <label>3</label>
            <p>. Cf. Wolfhart Pannenberg, Theology and the Philosophy of Science (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1976), p. 370, passim.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn4">
            <label>4</label>
            <p>. Karl Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 2nd ed. (New York: Basic Books, 1968), pp. 21–22; cited by Pannenberg, p. 37.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn5">
            <label>5</label>
            <p>. Norwood R. Hanson, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958), p. 18.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn6">
            <label>6</label>
            <p>. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1962), pp. 200–1; cited by Pannenberg, p. 177.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn7">
            <label>7</label>
            <p>. Pannenberg, p. 178.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn8">
            <label>8</label>
            <p>. Ibid., p. 179.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn9">
            <label>9</label>
            <p>. Ibid.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn10">
            <label>10</label>
            <p>. Ibid.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn11">
            <label>11</label>
            <p>. Ibid.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn12">
            <label>12</label>
            <p>. Hannah Tillich, From Time to Time (New York: Stein and Day, 1973).</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn13">
            <label>13</label>
            <p>. Ian Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice‐Hall, 1966), p. 183.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn14">
            <label>14</label>
            <p>. Pannenberg, p. 217n.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn15">
            <label>15</label>
            <p>. Ibid.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn16">
            <label>16</label>
            <p>. Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (New York: Harper &amp; Row, Harper Torch‐books, 1964), p. 283n.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn17">
            <label>17</label>
            <p>. Ibid.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn18">
            <label>18</label>
            <p>. This and the following comparative generalizations are based on the major works of Pannenberg and Polanyi already cited and on Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, vol. 1 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951), Part 1.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn19">
            <label>19</label>
            <p>. Apczynski, in this issue, pp. 71, 69.</p>
         </fn>
      </fn-group>
   </back>
</article>
