<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1987.tb00847.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>DOES IT MATTER HOW WE GOT HERE? DANGERS PERCEIVED IN LITERALISM AND EVOLUTIONISM</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Barker</surname>
                  <given-names>Eileen</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1987-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>1987</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>22</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1987.22.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>213</fpage>
         <lpage>225</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  Creationism and evolutionism are taken to typify a fundamental opposition among the diverse beliefs about creation to be found in the United Kingdom and the United States. A comparison between the two types and the two countries suggests that people may be more concerned about the credibility and consequences of belief in an alternative account of our origins than about the actual method by which we were created. Examples of concern include interpretations of the Bible, ethical implications, and the epistemological standings of revelation and/or science that are thought to follow from acceptance of a particular belief concerning how we got here.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>creationism</kwd>
            <kwd>evolutionism</kwd>
            <kwd>religion and science</kwd>
            <kwd>science and religion</kwd>
            <kwd>scientific creationism</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="journal">Barker, Eileen. 1976. “Value Systems Generated by Biologists. 
<source>Contact 
        </source>55 (no. 4):2–14.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Barker, Eileen. 1979a. “<source>In the Beginning: The Battle of Creationist Science against Evolutionism 
        </source>.” In On the Margins of Science, ed. 
RoyWallis, 179–200. 
            Keele
          : Keele Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="journal">Barker, Eileen. 1979b. “Thus Spake the Scientist: A Comparative Account of the New Priesthood and its Organizational Bases. 
<source>The Annual Review of the Social Sciences of Religion 
        </source>3:79–103.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="journal">Barker, Eileen. 1980. “Science and Theology:Diverse Resolutions of an Interdisciplinary Gap by the New Priesthood of Science. 
<source>Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 
        </source>5 (December):281–91.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Barker, Eileen. 1985. “<source>Let There Be Light: Scientific Creationism in the Twentieth Century 
        </source>.” In Darwinism and Divinity: Essays in Evolution and Religious Belief, ed. 
JohnDurant, 181–204. 
            Oxford
          : Martin Robertson.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Cox, Edwin. 1983. Problems and Possibilities for Religious Education. 
            London
          : Hodderand Stoughton.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Huxley, Julian. 1947. Evolution and Ethics. 
            London
          : Pilot Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Kitcher, Philip. 1982. Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. 
            Cambridge
            , 
            Mass.
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Monod, Jacques. 1972. Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. 
            London
          : Collins.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Morris, Henry. 1966. Studies in the Bible and Science. 
            Grand Rapids
          : Baker Book House.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Nelkin, Dorothy. 1982. The Creation Controversy: Science or Scripture in the Schools. 
            New York
          : W. W. Norton.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="journal">
Princeton Religious Research Center. 1982. “Public Found Evenly Divided in Debate on Evolution, Creationism. 
<source>Emerging Trends 
        </source>4 (October):4–6.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Ruse, Michael. 1982. Darwinism Defended: A Guide to the Evolution Controversies. Reading, Mass.: Addson–Wesley.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Stanesby, Derek. 1985. Science, Reason and Religion. 
            London
          : Croom Helm.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Waddington, C. H.. 1961. The Ethical Animal. 
            London
          : Allen and Unwin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
