<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1988.tb00637.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>ON MARTIN EGER'S “A TALE OF TWO CONTROVERSIES”</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Shimony</surname>
                  <given-names>Abner</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1988-09-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>09</month>
            <year>1988</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>23</volume>
         <issue>3</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1988.23.issue-3</issue-id>
         <fpage>333</fpage>
         <lpage>340</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  Criticisms are presented against Eger's challenge to the demarcation between the natural sciences and ethics. Arguments are given both against his endorsement of the “new” philosophy of science and against his rejection of the fact‐value dichotomy. However, his educational recommendations are reinforced rather than weakened by these criticisms</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>creation/evolution</kwd>
            <kwd>fact</kwd>
            <kwd>moral education</kwd>
            <kwd>“New” philosophy of science</kwd>
            <kwd>normative fact</kwd>
            <kwd>value</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. 
Many editions, including 1941 The Basic Work.s cf Aristotle. ed. 
RichardMcKeon, 927–1112. 
            New York
          : Random House.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="journal">Bruner, Jerome S. and 
LeoPostman. 1949. “On the Perception of Incongruity: a Paradigm<source>Journal of Personalzty 
        </source>18: 206–23.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="journal">Eger, Martin. 1988. “A Tale of Two Controversies: Dissonance in the Theory and Practice of Rationality<source>Zygon: journal of Relipon and Science 
        </source>23: 291–325.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1958. Patterns of Discovery. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="journal">Jeffreys. 
A Tale of Two Controversies: Dissonance in the Theory and Practice of Rationality. 
<source>Zygon: journal of Rilipon and science 
        </source>23: 291&amp;– 325.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Hanson, Harold. 1948. Theory of Probability, 2d ed. 
            Oxford
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientijic Revolutions, 2d ed. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biologica1 Thought. 
            Cambridge
            , 
            Mass.
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1932. Collected Papers, vol. 2 ed. 
CharlesHartshorne and 
PaulWeiss. 
            Cambridge
            , 
            Mass.
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personul Knowkdgr. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Russell, Bertrarid. 1914. Our Knowledge of tht External World. 
            London
          : Allen &amp; Unwin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Russell, Bertraid1927. The Analysis of Matter. 
            London
          : Allen &amp; Unwin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="journal">Sapir, Edward. 1924. “Culture, Genuine and Spurious<source>American Journal of Sociology 
        </source>29: 401–29.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Shiniony, Abner, 1970. “<source>Scientific Inference 
        </source>.” In The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, ed. 
R. G.Colodny. 
            Pittsburgh
          : Pittsburgh Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Shiniony, Abner. 1976. “<source>Comments on Two Epistemological Theses of Thomas Kuhn 
        </source>.” In Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, ed. 
R. S.Cohen, 
P. K.Feyerabend, and 
M. W.Wartof.sky. 
            Dordrecht
          : Reidel.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="book">Shiniony, Abner. 1978. “<source>Is Observation Theory‐Laden ?A Problem in Naturalistic Epistemology 
        </source>.” In Lop, Laws, and Life: Some Philosophical Complications, ed. 
R. G.Colodny. 
            Pittsburgh
          : Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
