<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00878.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>THE STATUS OF THE ANOMALY IN THE FEMINIST GOD‐TALK OF ROSEMARY RUETHER</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>James</surname>
                  <given-names>George Alfred</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1990-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>1990</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>25</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1990.25.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>167</fpage>
         <lpage>185</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  Scripture, the creeds, and tradition have provided the raw material that theology has attempted to refine. The contribution of much recent theology comes from new insight into these materials by women, blacks, and the Third World, often as examined by analytic tools derived from post‐Christian ideologies. The theology of Rosemary Ruether stands out because of her choice of sources, among which she includes documents excoriated as heretical by what she calls the patriarchal orthodoxy of the early Christian church. Because of this it is useful to examine this type of theology in relation to other theological inquiries of recent years. The thesis of this paper is that, in her ability to incorporate source material hitherto regarded as heretical, Ruether has demonstrated the scientific character of this kind of theology.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>feminist theology</kwd>
            <kwd>theology and science</kwd>
            <kwd>Rosemary Ruether</kwd>
            <kwd>anomalies</kwd>
            <kwd>Nag Hammadi</kwd>
            <kwd>Gnosticism</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Barth, Karl. 1936. The Doctrine of the World of God. Vol. 1, part 1 of Church Dogmatics, trans. 
G. T.Thompson (4 vols. in 13 parts). 
            New York
          : Scribner.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Barth, Karl. 1959. Protestant Thought: From Rousseau to Ritschl. Trans. 
BrianCozens. 
            New York
          : Harper.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Barth, Karl. 1960. “<source>Evangelical Theology in the Nineteenth Century 
        </source>.” In KarlBarth, The Humanity of God, trans. 
ThomasWieser. 
            Richmond
            , 
            VA.
          : John Knox Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Cone, James. 1970. A Block Theology of Liberation. 
            Philadelphia
          : Lippincott.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Douglas, Mary. 1966. Pun and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. 
            London
          : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Eliade, Mircea. 1959. The Sacred and the Profane. Trans. 
WillardR. Trask. 
            New York
          : Harcourt, Brace, and World.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Eusebius. 1967. The Histoy of the Church. Trans. 
G. A.Williamson. 
            London
          : Penguin Classic.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Feyerabend, Paul K.1978. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. 
            New York
          : Schocken.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">vanGennep, Arnold. 1972. The Rites of Passage. Trans. 
MonikaB. Vizedom and 
GabrielleL. Caffee. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="journal">Gunter, Pete A. Y..1980. “The History of Science: Warts and All. 
<source>Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 
        </source>11, 1: 7–24.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Gutierrez, Gustavo. 1973. A Theology of Liberation. CaridadInda and 
JohnEagleson. 
            New York
          : Orbis Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="journal">Hefner, Philip. 1988. “Theology's Truth and Scientific Formulatiom. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>23, no. 3.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Kuhn, Thomas S.1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Programmes, ed. 
JohnWorral and 
GregoryCurrie. 
            New York
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1969. “<source>The Debate about God: Victorian Relevance and Contemporary Irrelevance 
        </source>.” In The Religious Significance of Atheism, ed. 
AlasdairMacIntyre and 
PaulRicoeur. 
            New York
          : Columbia Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="journal">AlasdairMacIntyre andPaulRicoeur. 
Acceptability Criteria for Work in Theology and Science. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>22, no. 3.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Pagels, Elaine. 1981. The Gnostic Gospels. 
            New York
          : Random House.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="book">Popper, Karl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. 
            New York
          : Basic Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Ruether, Rosemary. 1983. Sexism and God‐Talk: Towards a Feminist Theology. 
            Boston
          : Beacon Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="book">Thomas(Gospel of). 1978. In The Nag Hammadi Library, ed. 
JamesM. Robinson. 
            New York
          : Harper and Row.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
