<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1991.tb00806.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>PHILOSOPHICAL AND RELIGIOUS IMPLICATIONS OF COGNITIVE SOCIAL LEARNING THEORIES OF PERSONALITY</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Rottschaefer</surname>
                  <given-names>William A.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1991-03-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>03</month>
            <year>1991</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>26</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1991.26.issue-1</issue-id>
         <fpage>137</fpage>
         <lpage>148</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  This paper sketches an alternative answer to James Jones's recent attempt to explore the implications of cognitive social learning theories of personality for issues in epistemology, philosophy of science, and religious studies. Since the 1960s, two cognitive revolutions have taken place in scientific psychology: the first made cognition central to theories of perception, memory, problem solving, and so on; the second made cognition central to theories of learning and behavior, among others. Cognitive social learning theories find their place in the latter revolution. Because of an ongoing naturalistic revolution in philosophy, these cognitive revolutions in psychology are having a profound effect on both descriptive and normative issues in epistemology and philosophy of science. From the naturalistic perspective, philosophy cannot adequately pursue its goals without the contributions of the empirical sciences, including psychology. The author concludes that the cognitive revolutions in psychology and the naturalistic revolution in philosophy have similar descriptive and normative import for the study of religion.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>cognitive psychology</kwd>
            <kwd>cognitive social learning theory</kwd>
            <kwd>naturalistic philosophy</kwd>
            <kwd>naturalized epistemology</kwd>
            <kwd>naturalized ethics</kwd>
            <kwd>normative epistemology</kwd>
            <kwd>religious studies</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Bandura, A.1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. 
            Englewood Cliffs
            , 
            N.J.
          : Prentice‐Hall.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="journal">Bandura, A.. 1989. “Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory.<source>American Psychologist 
        </source>44: 1175–84.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Bower, G. H., and 
E. R.Hilgard. 1981. Theories of Learning. 5th ed. 
            Englewood Cliffs
            , 
            N.J.
          : Prentice‐Hall.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Brown, R. B.1984. Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn. 
            Dordrecht
          : D. Reidel.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Brown, R. B.1989. The Rational and the Social. 
            New York
          : Routledge.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Churchland, P. M.1988. Matter and Consciousness. Rev. ed. 
            Cambridge
            , 
            Mass.
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Churchland, P.S.1986. Neurophilosophy. 
            Cambridge
            , 
            Mass.
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Dennett, D.1978. Brainstorms. 
            Cambridge
            , 
            Mass.
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Erwin, E.1978. Behavior Therapy: Scientific, Philosophical, and Moral Foundations. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Fodor, J.1986. Psychological Explanation: An Introduction to Philosophical Psychology. 
            New York
          : Random House.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Gardner, H.1985. The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. 
            New York
          : Basic Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Gibbard, A.1990. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Nonnative Judgment. 
            Cambridge
            , 
            Mass.
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Giere, R.1988. Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Goldman, A. I.1986. Epistemology and Cognition. 
            Cambridge
            , 
            Mass.
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Hull, D. L.1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social und Conceptual Developments of Science. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="journal">Jones, J.1989. “Personality and Epistemology: Cognitive Social Learning Theory as a Philosophy of Science. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>24: 23–38.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Kornblith, H., ed. 1985. Naturalizing Epistemology. 
            Cambridge
            , 
            Mass.
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="book">Mischel, W., and 
H.Mischel. 1976. “<source>A Cognitive Social‐Learning Approach to Morality &amp; Self‐Regulation 
        </source>. 
In Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research &amp; Social Issues, ed. Thomas Lickona, 84–107. 
            New York
          : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Mischel, W., and 
H.Mischel. 1977. “<source>Self Control &amp; the Self 
        </source>. 
In The Self: Psychological &amp; Philosophical Issues, ed. 
T.Mischel, 31–64. 
            Oxford
          : Basil Blackwell.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="book">Preus, J. S.1987. Explaining Religion: Criticism and Theory from Bodin to Freud. 
            New Haven
          : Yale Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b21">
            <mixed-citation id="cit21" publication-type="book">Quine, V. W.1969. Word and Object. 
            New York
          : Columbia Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b22">
            <mixed-citation id="cit22" publication-type="book">Richards, R.1987. Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b23">
            <mixed-citation id="cit23" publication-type="book">Rorty, R.1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. 
            Princeton
            , 
            N.J.
          : Princeton Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b24">
            <mixed-citation id="cit24" publication-type="journal">Rottschaefer, W.1986. “Learning to Be a Moral Agent. 
<source>Personalist Forum 
        </source>2: 122–44.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b25">
            <mixed-citation id="cit25" publication-type="journal">Rottschaefer, W.1988. “The New Interactionism between Science and Religion. 
<source>Religious Studies Review 
        </source>14: 218–55.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b26">
            <mixed-citation id="cit26" publication-type="journal">Rottschaefer, W. and 
D.Martinsen. 1990. “Really Taking Darwin Seriously: An Alternative to Michael Ruse's Darwinian Metaethics. 
<source>Biology and Philosophy 
        </source>5: 149–75.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b27">
            <mixed-citation id="cit27" publication-type="book">Ruse, M.1986. Taking Darwin Seriously. 
            New York
          : Basil Blackwell.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b28">
            <mixed-citation id="cit28" publication-type="book">Sellars, W.1963. Science, Perception and Reality. 
            London
          : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b29">
            <mixed-citation id="cit29" publication-type="book">Suppe, F., ed. 1977. The Structure of Scientific Theories. 2d ed. 
            Urbana
          : Univ. of Illinois Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
