<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1991.tb00816.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>CURRENT TRENDS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF MEDICINE</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Potter</surname>
                  <given-names>Robert Lyman</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1991-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>1991</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>26</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1991.26.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>259</fpage>
         <lpage>276</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  The philosophy of medicine, a developing discipline, is defined as critical reflection on the activity of medicine. The clinical encounter is both its central aspect and the focus for philosophical analysis. The most systematic example of this discipline employs a mixture of empiricism and phenomenology. Systems thought presents an organizing schema by which the philosophy of medicine can move toward a more comprehensive and fundamental analysis of its own agenda, which includes four main topics: understanding the patient‐physician interaction, concepts of health and disease, foundations of medical ethics, and the dialogue between medicine and the larger culture.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>clinical encounter</kwd>
            <kwd>empiricism</kwd>
            <kwd>phenomenology</kwd>
            <kwd>philosophy of medicine</kwd>
            <kwd>systems analysis</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. 1952. Problems of Life: An Evaluation of Modern Biological and Scientific Thought. 
            London
          : Watts.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="journal">Brody, Howard. 1985. “Philosophy of Medicine and Other Humanities: Toward a Wholistic View.<source>Theoretical Medicine 
        </source>6:243–55.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="journal">Engel, George L.1977. “The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Bio‐medicine. 
<source>Science 
        </source>196: 129–36.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="journal">Engelhardt, H. Tristram, Jr.1973. “The Philosophy of Medicine: A New Endeavor. 
<source>Texas Reports on Biology and Medicine 
        </source>31(3): 443–52.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Ford, Marcus P., ed. 1987. A Process Theory of Medicine: Interdisciplinary Essays. 
            Lewis‐ton
            , 
            N. Y.
          : Edwin Mellen Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Foss, 
Laurence, and 
KennethRothenberg. 1988. The Second Medical Revolution: From Biomedicine to Infomedicine. 
            Boston
          : Shambhala.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Kass, Leon R.1985. Toward a More Natural Science. 
            New York
          : Free Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Ledermann, E. K.1986. Philosophy and Medicine. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">McKeown, Thomas. 1979. The Role of Medicine: Dream, Mirage, or Nemesis? 
            Princeton
            , 
            N.J
          ,: Princeton Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">McKeownMiller, James G.1978. Living Systems. 
            New York
          : McGraw‐Hill.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="journal">Pellegrino, Edmund. 1976. “Philosophy of Medicine: Problematic and Potential. 
<source>Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 
        </source>1(1): 5–31.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">
—.1979. Humanism and the Physician. 
            Knoxville
          : Univ. of Tennessee Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">
—.1983. “<source>The Healing Relationship: The Architectonics of Clinical Practice. 
        </source>In The Clinical Encounter: The Moral Fabric of the Patient‐Physician Relationship, Earl E.Shelp, 153–72. 
            Dordrecht
            , 
            The Netherlands
          : D. Reidel.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="journal">Pellegrino, Edmund. 1986. “Philosophy of Medicine: Towards a Definition.<source>Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 
        </source>11:9–16.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Pellegrino, Edmund, and 
David C.Thomasma. 1981. A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="journal">Schwartz, Michael, and 
OsborneWiggins. 1985. “Science, Humanism, and the Nature of Medical Practice: A Phenomenological View.<source>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 
        </source>28(3): 331–60.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="journal">Seldin, Donald W.1981. “The Boundaries of Medicine.<source>Transactions of the Association of American Physicians 
        </source>94: 75–86.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="journal">Temkin, Owsei. 1956. “On the Interrelationship of the History and the Philosophy of Medicine.<source>Bulletin of the History of Medicine 
        </source>30(3): 241–51.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="journal">Toulmin, Stephen. 1982. “How Medicine Saved the Life of Ethics.<source>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 
        </source>25: 736–50.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="book">Van der Steen, Wim J., and 
P. J.Thung. 1987. Faces of Medicine: A Philosophical Study. 
            Boston
          : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b21">
            <mixed-citation id="cit21" publication-type="journal">Verwey, Gerlof. 1987. “Toward a Systematic Philosophy of Medicine.<source>Theoretical Medicine 
        </source>8: 163–77.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b22">
            <mixed-citation id="cit22" publication-type="journal">Wallace, Edwin R., IV.1988. “What Is ‘Truth’?: Some Philosophical Contributions to Psychiatric Issues.<source>American Journal of Psychiatry 
        </source>145(2): 137–47.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b23">
            <mixed-citation id="cit23" publication-type="book">Wartofsky, Marx W.1977. “<source>How to Begin Again: Medical Therapies for the Philosophy of Science 
        </source>.” In PSA1976. Vol. 2, ed. Frederick and 
Peter D.Asquith. 
            East Lansing
            , 
            Mich.
          : Philosophy of Science Association.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b24">
            <mixed-citation id="cit24" publication-type="book">Weiss, Paul. 1973. The Science of Life: The Living System – A System of living. New York: Futura.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b25">
            <mixed-citation id="cit25" publication-type="book">Whitbeck, Caroline. 1977. “<source>The Relevance of Philosophy of Medicine for the Philosophy of Science 
        </source>. 
In PSA1976. Vol. 2, ed. FrederickSuppe and Peter D.Asquith. 
            East Lansing
            , 
            Mich
          : Philosophy of Science Association.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b26">
            <mixed-citation id="cit26" publication-type="book">Wulff, Henrik R.m, 
Stig AndurPedersen, and 
RabenRosenberg. 1986. Philosophy of Medicine: An Introduction. 
            Boston
          : Blackwell Scientific Publications.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
