<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1991.tb00823.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>ON THE TRANSDISCIPLINARY NATURE OF THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF DISCOVERY</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Shames</surname>
                  <given-names>Morris L.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1991-09-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>09</month>
            <year>1991</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>26</volume>
         <issue>3</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1991.26.issue-3</issue-id>
         <fpage>343</fpage>
         <lpage>357</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  Despite the by now historical tendency to demarcate scientific epistemology sharply from virtually all others, especially theological “epistemology,” it has recently been recognized that both enterprises share a great deal in common, at least as far as the epistemology of discovery is implicated. Such a claim is founded upon a psychological analysis of figuration, where, it is argued, metaphor plays a crucial role in the mediation of discovery, in the domains of science and religion alike. Thus, although the conventionally conceived scientific method is crucial to the enterprise, primacy must nonetheless be accorded to discovery, which drives virtually all disciplines.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>cognition</kwd>
            <kwd>discovery</kwd>
            <kwd>epistemology</kwd>
            <kwd>figuration</kwd>
            <kwd>metaphor</kwd>
            <kwd>scientific method</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="journal">Bakan, David. 1960.“The Test of Significance in Psychological Research.<source>Psychological Bulletin 
        </source>66:423–37.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Bakan, David1974. On Method: Toward a Reconstruction of Psychological Investigation. 
            San Francisco
          : Jossey‐Bass.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Black, Max. 1979. “<source>More about Metaphor 
        </source>.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. AndrewOrtony, 19–43. 
            New York
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Boyd, Richard. 1979. “<source>Metaphor and Theory Change: What Is 'Metaphor' a Metaphor For? 
        </source>” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. AndrewOrtony, 356–408. 
            New York
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Bruner, Jerome. 1962. “<source>The Conditions of Creativity 
        </source>.” In Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking, ed. Howard E.Gruber, 
GlennTerrell, and 
MichaelWertheimer, 1–30. 
            New York
          : Atherton.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Bunge, Mario. 1962. Intuition and Science. 
            Englewood Cliffs
            , 
            N.J.
          : Prentice‐Hall.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Bywater, Ingram. 1909. Aristotle on the Art of Poetry. 
            London
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Campbell, Norman R.1920. Physics, the Elements. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Cassirer, Ernst. 1970. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. 
            New York
          : Bantam Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Language and Mind. 
            New York
          : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">deLaszlo, Viola S.1959. The Basic Writings of C. G. Jung. 
            New York
          : Modern Library.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="journal">deMan, Paul.1978.“ The Epistemology of Metaphor.<source>Critical Inquiry 
        </source>5:13–30.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Dreyfus, Hubert L., and 
Stuart E.Dreyfus. 1986. Mind over Machine. 
            New York
          : Free Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against Method. 
            London
          : New Left Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Frye, Northrop. 1957. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. 
            Princeton
            , 
            N.J.
          : Princeton Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="book">Frye, Northrop1982. The Great Code: The Bible and Literature. 
            New York
          : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Gadamer, Hans‐Georg. 1975. Truth and Method. 
            New York
          : Continuum.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="book">Gadamer, Hans‐Georg. 1981. Reason in the Age of Science. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Gordon, William J.1961. Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity. 
            New York
          : Harper and Row.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="journal">Grene, Marjorie. 1987.”Hierarchies in Biology.<source>American Scientist 
        </source>75:504–10.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b21">
            <mixed-citation id="cit21" publication-type="book">Habgood, J. S.1963. “<source>The Uneasy Truce between Science and Religion 
        </source>.” In Soundings, ed. A. R.Vidler, 21–41. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge University Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b22">
            <mixed-citation id="cit22" publication-type="book">Hertler, Johann G.1959. Uber den Ursprung der Sprache. 
            Berlin
          : Akademie–Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b23">
            <mixed-citation id="cit23" publication-type="book">Humboldt, Wilhelm Von. 1941. Gesammelte Werke. 
            Berlin
          : Akademie‐Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b24">
            <mixed-citation id="cit24" publication-type="book">Jaynes, Julian. 1976. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. 
            Boston
          : Houghton Mifflin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b25">
            <mixed-citation id="cit25" publication-type="journal">Jaynes, Julian.1986.“Consciousness and the Voices of the Mind.<source>Canadian Psychology 
        </source>27: 128–39.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b26">
            <mixed-citation id="cit26" publication-type="book">Jung, Carl G.1969. Four Archelypes: Mother/Rebirth/Spirit/Trickster. 
            Princeton
            , 
            N.J.
          : Princeton Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b27">
            <mixed-citation id="cit27" publication-type="journal">Koch, Sigmund. 1981.“ The Nature and Limits of Psychological Knowledge: Lessons of a Century qua 'Science.'<source>American Psychologist 
        </source>36: 257–69.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b28">
            <mixed-citation id="cit28" publication-type="journal">Libby, Walter. 1922.“ The Scientific Imagination.<source>Scientific Monthly 
        </source>15:263–70.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b29">
            <mixed-citation id="cit29" publication-type="book">Lonergan, Bernard J.1978. Insight: A Study of Human Understanding. 
            New York
          : Harper and Row.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b30">
            <mixed-citation id="cit30" publication-type="journal">Lugg, Andrew.1986.“An Alternative to the Traditional Model? Laudan on Disagreement and Consensus in Science.<source>Philosophy of Science 
        </source>53:419–24.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b31">
            <mixed-citation id="cit31" publication-type="book">MacCormac, Earl R.1976. Metaphor and Myth in Science and Religion. 
            Durham
            , 
            N.C.
          : Duke Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b32">
            <mixed-citation id="cit32" publication-type="book">MacCormac, Earl R.1983. “<source>Scientific Metaphors as Necessary Conceptual Limitations of Science 
        </source>.” InThe Limits of Lawfulness: Studies on the Scope and Nature of Scientific Knowledge, ed. NicholasRescher, 61–68. 
            Lanharn
          : University Press of America.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b33">
            <mixed-citation id="cit33" publication-type="book">Medawar, Peter B.1969. Induction and Intuition in Scienfific Thought. 
            Philadelphia
          : American Philosophical Society.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b34">
            <mixed-citation id="cit34" publication-type="journal">Meehl, Paul.1967.“ Theory‐testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox.<source>Philosophy of Science 
        </source> (June): 103–15.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b35">
            <mixed-citation id="cit35" publication-type="book">Meynell, Hugo.1976. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Bernard Lonergan. 
            London
          : Macmillan.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b36">
            <mixed-citation id="cit36" publication-type="book">Newell, Allen, and 
Herbert A.Simon. 1981. “<source>Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry. Symbols and Search 
        </source>. 
In Mind Design: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, ed. 
JohnHaugeland, 35–66. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b37">
            <mixed-citation id="cit37" publication-type="journal">Olson, David R.. 1986.“ The Cognitive Consequences of Literacy. 
<source>Canadian Psychology 
        </source>27:109–21.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b38">
            <mixed-citation id="cit38" publication-type="book">Pattee, Howard H.1973. Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems. 
            New York
          : George Braziller.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b39">
            <mixed-citation id="cit39" publication-type="book">Penn, Julia M.1972. Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas. 
            The Hague
          : Mouton.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b40">
            <mixed-citation id="cit40" publication-type="book">Phillips, John L., Jr.1975. The Origins of Intellect: Piaget's Theory. 
            San Francisco
          : W. H. Freeman and Co..
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b41">
            <mixed-citation id="cit41" publication-type="book">Piaget, Jean.1950Introduction à l'Epistemologie Génétique. 
            Paris
          : Presses Universitaires de France.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b42">
            <mixed-citation id="cit42" publication-type="book">Popper, Karl K.1965. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scienfific Knowledge 
            New York
          : Harper and Row.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b43">
            <mixed-citation id="cit43" publication-type="book">Popper, Karl K.1973. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. 
            London
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b44">
            <mixed-citation id="cit44" publication-type="book">Rrichenbach, Hans. 1938. Experience and Prediction. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press. Phoenix Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b45">
            <mixed-citation id="cit45" publication-type="book">Rothbart, Daniel. 1986. “<source>Scientific Unification through Metaphor 
        </source>.” In Essays on Creativity and Science, ed. Diana M.DeLuca, 163–66. 
            Honolulu
          : Hawaii Council of Teachers of English.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b46">
            <mixed-citation id="cit46" publication-type="book">Royee, Joseph R.1971. “<source>Pebble Picking vs. Boulder Building 
        </source>.” InHistorical Perspectives in Psychology: Readings, ed. Virginia S.Sexton and 
HenrykMysiak, 223–28. 
            Belmont
            , 
            Calif.
          : Brooks/Cole.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b47">
            <mixed-citation id="cit47" publication-type="book">Royee, Joseph R.1988. “<source>The Implications of Differential Theory Appraisal and the Context of Discovery for Advancing Theory in Psychology 
        </source>.” In Recent Trends in Theoretical Prycholoqy, ed. William J.Baker, 
Leendert P.Mos, 
Hans vanRappard, and 
Henderikus, J. Stam, 59–64. 
            New York
          : Springer‐Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b48">
            <mixed-citation id="cit48" publication-type="journal">Royee, Joseph K., 
HaroldCoward, 
Eugene, Egan, 
Frank, Kessel, and 
Leendert, Mos. 1978.“Psychological Epistemology: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature and the Theoretical Issues.<source>Genetic Psychology Monographs 
        </source>97: 265–353.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b49">
            <mixed-citation id="cit49" publication-type="journal">Sapirs, Edward. 1931.“Conceptual Categories in Primitive Languages.<source>Science 
        </source>74:578.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b50">
            <mixed-citation id="cit50" publication-type="journal">Searle, John R.. 1980.“Mind, Brains and Programs.<source>Behavioral and Brain Sciences 
        </source>3:417–57.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b51">
            <mixed-citation id="cit51" publication-type="book">Shames, Morris L.1985. “<source>Literary Theory, Analytical Psychology and the Scientific Imagination 
        </source>. 
Paper delivered at the 17th International Congress of History of Science, University of California, 
            Berkeley
          .
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b52">
            <mixed-citation id="cit52" publication-type="book">Shames, Morris L.1987. “<source>Methodocentricity, Theoretical Sterility and the Sociobehavioural Sciences 
        </source>.” In Current Issues in Theoretical Psychology, ed. William J.Baker, 
Michael E.Hyland, 
Hans vanRappard, and 
Arthur W.Staats, 261–82. 
            North Holland
          : Elsevier Science Publishers B.V..
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b53">
            <mixed-citation id="cit53" publication-type="book">Shames, Morris L.1988. “<source>Scientific Epistemology: A Psycholiterary Approach 
        </source>”. In Recent Trends in Theoretical Psychology, ed. William J.Baker, 
Leendert P.Mos, 
Hans vanRappard, and 
Henderikus J.Stam, 47–57. 
            New York
          : Springer‐Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b54">
            <mixed-citation id="cit54" publication-type="book">Simon, Herbert A.1973. “<source>The Organization of Complex Systems 
        </source>.” In Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, ed. Howard H.Pattee, 1–27. 
            New York
          : George Braziller.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b55">
            <mixed-citation id="cit55" publication-type="book">Snow, Charles P.1963. The Two Cullures: And a Second Look. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b56">
            <mixed-citation id="cit56" publication-type="book">Vygotsky, Lev S.1962. Thought and Language. 
            Cambridge
          : M.I.T. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b57">
            <mixed-citation id="cit57" publication-type="book">Whorf, Benjamin L.1956. Language, Thought and Reality. 
            Cambridge
          : M.I.T. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b58">
            <mixed-citation id="cit58" publication-type="book">Wolf, Abraham. [1930] 1962. Textbook of Logic. 
            New York
          : Collier Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b59">
            <mixed-citation id="cit59" publication-type="book">Worrall, John, and 
GregCurrie. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1, Imre Lakatos. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
