<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01027.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>THINKING ABOUT RELIGION AND EXPERIENCING THE BRAIN: EUGENE D'AQUILI'S BIOGENETIC STRUCTURAL THEORY OF ABSOLUTE UNITARY BEING</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Holmes</surname>
                  <given-names>H. Rodney</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1993-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>1993</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>28</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1993.28.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>201</fpage>
         <lpage>215</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  Religious experiences, including mystical states and experience of the divine, are the ultimate reality of human existence that demand an account. Eugene d'Aquili weaves together that account using paradigms of thought which historically have made mutually exclusive claims about the nature of religious experience. While pointing out the deficiencies of the theory from a narrowly scientific point of view, this paper recognizes that neuroscience, or any other solitary discipline, is incompetent to explain religion. This paper emphasizes the significance and truth of d'Aquili's holistic theory, a religious vision which itself explains science and philosophy.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>mystical experience</kwd>
            <kwd>mysticism</kwd>
            <kwd>naturalism</kwd>
            <kwd>neurology</kwd>
            <kwd>neuroscience</kwd>
            <kwd>realism</kwd>
            <kwd>religious experience</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="journal">D'Aquili, Eugene G.1978. “The Neurobiological Bases of Myth and Concepts of Deity. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>13 (December):257–75.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="journal">D'Aquili, Eugene G.1983. “The Myth‐Ritual Complex: A Biogenetic Structural Analysis. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>18(September):247–69.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="other">D'Aquili, Eugene G.1991. “<source>Religion as a System of Self‐Maintenance and Self‐Transcendence: A Biogenetic Structural Analysis 
        </source>. 
<source>Paper presented at the symposium “Human Viability and World Theology,” made possible by the John Templeton Religion Trust, Chicago Center for Religion and Science, 15–16 November 
        </source>.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="journal">D'Aquili, Eugene G., and 
Andrew B.Newberg. 1993. “Religious and Mystical States: A Neuropsychological Model. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>28(June):177–200.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Grene, Marjorie.1974. The Understanding of Nature: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. 
            Boston
          : Reidel Publishing.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="journal">James, William. [Ignoramus, pseud.] 1874. “'The Mood of Science and the Mood of Faith.<source>The Nation 
        </source>19:437.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="journal">James, William.1877. “The Mind and the Brain. 
<source>The Nation 
        </source>24:355–56.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">James, William. [1902]. 1990. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. The Gifford Lectures on Natural Religion delivered at Edinburgh in 1901–1902, ed. JaroslavPelikan. 
            New York
          : Vintage Books/Library of America.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Jaynes, Julian.1976. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. 
            Boston
          : Houghton Mifflin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="other">Laughlin, Charles D., Jr., 
JohnMcManus, and 
EugeneG. d'Aquili. [1990] 1992. <source>Brain Symbol &amp; Experience: Toward a Neurophenomenology of Human Consciousness 
        </source>. Boston: Shambhala. Reprint. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="journal">Midgley, Mary.1979. “Gene‐juggling. 
<source>Philosophy 
        </source>54:439–58.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
