<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1994.tb00688.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>CAN NATURE TRULY BE OUR FRIEND?</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Hefner</surname>
                  <given-names>Philip</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1994-12-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>12</month>
            <year>1994</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>29</volume>
         <issue>4</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1994.29.issue-4</issue-id>
         <fpage>507</fpage>
         <lpage>528</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  The question of whether nature can embody love or be considered in this sense as “friend” is a thorny problem for Christian theology. The doctrines of finitude and sin argue against nature as a realm of love, whereas the doctrine of creation out of nothing, which links God and the creation so forcefully, would seem to argue for such a view of nature. This paper explores the thesis that Western culture has not offered a concept of nature rich enough to allow for an understanding of it as a domain of gracious‐ness. From pre‐Socratic times through the Enlightenment and the rise of modern science, nature was conceived of as a realm of defect or lacking in creative possibilities. Christian theology has consistently spoken of nature in terms that defy the limitations of the authorized views proposed by the ambient Western cultures. The present times, under the influence of the sciences, have furnished for the first time an authorized concept of nature that is large enough and dynamic enough to entertain the dimension of grace. Consequently, ours is a time of great promise for developing a more adequate theology of nature.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>Chalcedon</kwd>
            <kwd>R. G. Collingwood</kwd>
            <kwd>creation out of nothing</kwd>
            <kwd>finite is capable of the infinite</kwd>
            <kwd>incarnation</kwd>
            <kwd>love</kwd>
            <kwd>means of grace</kwd>
            <kwd>nature</kwd>
            <kwd>sacrament</kwd>
            <kwd>Timaeus</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Barbour, Ian.1989. <source>“Creation and Cosmology 
        </source>.” In Cosmos as Creation, ed. 
TedPeters, pp. 45–114. 
            Nashville
          : Abingdon Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Collingwood, R. G.1945. The Idea of Nature. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Deason, Gary B.1986. “<source>ldquo;Reformation Theology and the Mechanistic Conception of Nature. 
        </source>” In Lindberg and Numbers1986, pp. 167–91.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Eaves, Lindon. 1993. <source>“Science and Spirituality.” 
        </source>Unpublished paper delivered at the Templeton Symposium, “Science and Religion: Two Ways of Experiencing and Interpreting the World,” 
            Chicago
          , 1September 1993.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="journal">GilkeyLangdon. 1994. “Nature as the Image of God: Reflections on the Signs of the Sacred. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>29 (December 489–505.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="other">Grant, Edward. 1986. “<source>Science and Theology in the Middle Ages 
        </source>.” In 
            Lindberg
           andNumbers 1986, pp. 49–75</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Hardy, Edward. 1954. Christology of the Later Fathers. 
            Philadelphia
          :Westminster Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="journal">KlinkWilliam. 1994. “Ecology and Eschatology: Science and Theological Modeling. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>29 (December): 529–45.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Lindberg, David, and Ronald Numbers. 1986. God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science.
            Berkeley
           and 
            Los Angeles
          : Univ. of California Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">McMullin, Ernan. 1981. “<source>How Should Cosmology Relate to Theology 
        </source>” In The Sciences and Theology in the Twentieth Century, ed. 
A. R.Peacocke, pp. 17–57. 
            Notre Dame
            , 
            Ind.
          : Univ. of Notre Dame Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Meland, Bernard. 1962. The Realities of Faith. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Newton, Isaac. [1705] 1934. Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World. Trans.AndrewMotte, ed. 
FlorianCajori. 
            Berkeley
           and 
            Los Angeles
          : Univ. of California Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="journal">Oxtoby, David. 1994. “Sudden Change in the World. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>29 (December) 547–55.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Peters, Ted.1989. Preface and “<source>Cosmos as Creation 
        </source>.” In Cosmos as Creation, ed. 
TedPeters, pp. 11–27, 45–114. 
            Nashville
          : Abingdon Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Plato. [1892] 1937. “<source>Timaeus. 
        </source>” In The Dialogues of Plato, trans. B.Jowett, vol.1, pp. 3–68. 
            New York
          : Random House.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="book">Polkinghorne, John. 1988. Science and Creation. 
            London
          : SPCK.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Sperry, Roger. 1983. Science and Moral Priority: Merging Mind, Brain, and Human Values. 
            New York
          : Columbia Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="other">Stoeckle, Bernhard. 1962. <source>Gratia Supponit Naturam: Geschichte und Analyse eines theologischen Axioms. Rome: Pontifical Institute of St. Anselm 
        </source>.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Wildiers, Max.1982. <source>The Theologian and His Universe 
        </source>: Theology and Cosmology from the Middle Ages to the Present. 
            New York
          : Seabury Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="book">Wilken, Robert L.1984. The Christians as the Romans Saw Them. 
            New Haven
          : Yale Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
