<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1995.tb00073.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>CONTRIBUTIONS OF TIPLER'S OMEGA POINT THEORY</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Birtel</surname>
                  <given-names>Frank T.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1995-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>1995</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>30</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1995.30.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>315</fpage>
         <lpage>327</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  An attempt to discover what can be learned from the recent work of Frank Tipler on the Omega Point theory requires an analysis of his framework of understanding from scientific, philosophical, and theological perspectives. A critique of his crucial ideas, and of the salient points raised by some of his critics, can then be undertaken within the compass of his strengths. A critique of the critiques of Tipler's work allows one to evaluate the extent and limitations of his contributions.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>being</kwd>
            <kwd>cosmology</kwd>
            <kwd>determinism</kwd>
            <kwd>eschatology</kwd>
            <kwd>eternity</kwd>
            <kwd>existence</kwd>
            <kwd>God</kwd>
            <kwd>Many Worlds</kwd>
            <kwd>Omega Point</kwd>
            <kwd>physics</kwd>
            <kwd>quantum theory</kwd>
            <kwd>reductionism</kwd>
            <kwd>resurrection</kwd>
            <kwd>science‐religion integration</kwd>
            <kwd>teleology</kwd>
            <kwd>theology</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="journal">Birtel, F. T.1993. “Commentary on the Science‐Religion Controversy” (guest editorial). 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>28 (December): 420–24.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Hegel, G. W. F. [181213] 1929. Wissmschaft der Lagik (Hegel's Science of Logic). In Werke, vol. 4. Trans. 
W. H.Johnson and 
L. G.Struthers. 
            New York
          : Allen &amp; Unwin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Küng, H.1978. Does God Exist? 
            New York
          : Doubleday.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Monod, J.1971. Chance and Necessity. 
            New York
          : Knopf.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="journal">Pannenberg, W.1981. “Theological Questions to Scientists. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>16 (March): 65–77.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="journal">Pannenberg, W.1984. “Constructive and Critical Functions of Christian Eschatology. 
<source>Harvard Theological Review 
        </source>77: 119–39.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Peacocke, A.1990. Theology for a Scientific Age. 
            Oxford
          : Blackwell.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Schillebeeckx, E.1991. Church: The Human Story of God. 
            New York
          : Crossroad.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Teilhard de Chardin, P. 1975. The Phenomenon of Man. 
            New York
          : Harper and Row.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Tipler, F.1994. The Physics of Immortality: Modern Cosmology, God and the Resurrection of the Dead. 
            New York
          : Doubleday.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
