<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1995.tb00066.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>RESPONSE TO ROTTSCHAEFER, BECKLEY, AND KONNER</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Gustafson</surname>
                  <given-names>James M.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1995-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>1995</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>30</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1995.30.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>221</fpage>
         <lpage>226</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  All three articles properly locate my work as interactive between the sciences on the one hand and theology and ethics on the other. They disagree on whether tradition, science, or experience “trumps” the others when they conflict; Beckley shows the importance of tradition, which is slighted by the other two. Comments on each article indicate where further discussion is needed and where I have learned from the authors or agree with them.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>ethics</kwd>
            <kwd>experience</kwd>
            <kwd>sciences</kwd>
            <kwd>theology</kwd>
            <kwd>tradition</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Dewey, John. 1934. A Common Faith. 
            New Haven
          : Yale Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="journal">Gustafson, Janes M.1993. “Scientific Dreamers and Religious Speculation. 
<source>The Christian Century 
        </source>110 (March 10): 269–74.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Selznick, Philip. 1992. The Moral Commonwealth. 
            Berkeley
          : Univ. of California Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
