<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1995.tb00086.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>FRANK TIPLER'S PHYSICAL ESCHATOLOGY</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Mutschler</surname>
                  <given-names>Hans‐Dieter</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1995-09-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>09</month>
            <year>1995</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>30</volume>
         <issue>3</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1995.30.issue-3</issue-id>
         <fpage>479</fpage>
         <lpage>490</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  Frank L. Tipler's book The Physics of Immortality is a striking attempt by a scientist to resolve the conflict between theology and science on the basis of a physicalist position that identifies theology as a branch of physics, and that calculates God “in exactly the same way as physicists calculate the characteristics of electrons.” Tipler's work may be seen as a scientistic myth, and its critique is organized around the three basic characteristics of such myths: (1) it is illogical in that it argues as if physics were in fact metaphysics; (2) it is grim in that its glorification of technology is insensitive to ethical issues; (3) it is meaningless in that its espousal of a strong theory of artificial intelligence empties concrete personal histories by subsuming them under abstractions that distort our understandings both of God and of resurrection.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>computer</kwd>
            <kwd>metaphysics</kwd>
            <kwd>physicalism</kwd>
            <kwd>physics</kwd>
            <kwd>reductionism</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Apel, Karl‐Otto. 1976. Transformation der Philosophic. 2 vols. 
            Frankfurt
          : Suhrkamp Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Danto, Arthur C. 1965. Analytical Philosophy of ‘History’. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Falkenburg, Brigitte. 1994. Teilchenmetaphysik. Zur Realitätsauffassung in Wissenschafts‐philosophie und Mikrophysik. 
            Mannheim
          : Bl‐Wissenschaftsverlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2 vols. 
            Frankfurt
          : Suhrkamp Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Haken, Hermann. 1984. Erfolgsgeheimnisse der Nature (Synergetik: Die Lehre vom Zusammemvirken). 
            Frankfurt
          : Ullstein Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Kutschera, Franzvon. 1993. Die falsche Objektivität. 
            Berlin
          : de Gruyter Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Mayr, Ernst. 1988. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology. 
            Cambridge
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Mutschler, Hans‐Dieter. 1990. Spekulative und empirische Physik. Aktualität and Grenzen der Naturphilosophie Schellings. 
            Stuttgart
          : Kohlhammer Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Mutschler, Hans‐Dieter. 1992. Physik—Religion—New Age. 
            Würzburg
          : Echter Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Pannenberg, Wolfhart. 1976. Theology and the Philosophy of Science. 
            Philadelphia
          : Westminster.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="journal">Pannenberg, Wolfhart. 1989. “Theological Appropriation of Scientific Understandings: Response to Hefner, Wicken, Eaves, and Tipler. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>24 (June): 255–71.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Pannenberg, Wolfhart. 1994. Systematic Theology. Vol. 2. 
            Grand Rapids
            , 
            Mich.
          : Wm. B. Eerdmans.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="journal">Pannenberg, Wolfhart. 1995. “Breaking a Taboo: Frank Tipler's <italic>Physics of Immortality</italic>. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>30 (June): 309–14.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Prigogine, I., and 
IStengers. 1984. Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. 
            New York
          : Bantam Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="journal">Primas, Hans. 1985. “Kann Chemie auf Physik reduziert werden<source>Chemie in unserer Zeit 
        </source>, August/October: 109–99.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="journal">Searle, John. 1980. “Minds, Brains, and Programs. 
<source>Behavior and Brain Sciences 
        </source>3/3: 417–57.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Sesink, Werner. 1993. Menschliche und künstliche Intelligenz: Der kleine Unterschied. 
            Stuttgart
          : Klett‐Cotta Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="book">Strawson, Peter F.1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. 
            London
          : Methuen.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Wright, Georgvon. 1971. Erklären und Verstehen. 
            Frankfurt
          : Fischer Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
