<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/0591-2385.731997073</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>Philosophy of Science: What One Needs to Know</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Clayton</surname>
                  <given-names>Philip</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1997-03-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>03</month>
            <year>1997</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>32</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1997.32.issue-1</issue-id>
         <fpage>95</fpage>
         <lpage>104</lpage>
         <permissions>
            <copyright-statement>1997 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon</copyright-statement>
         </permissions>
         <abstract>
            <p>This introduction to the philosophy of science offers an overview of the major concepts and developments in contemporary theories of science. Strengths and weaknesses of deductive, inductive, and falsificationist models of science are considered. The “Received View” in the theory of science is contrasted with Kuhn's paradigms and Feyerabend's “anything goes,” leading to an examination of the merits of a research program–based approach. After touching on the sociology of science, postmodernism, and the feminist critique, the article concludes with a summary, in six theses, of the implications for religion/science.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>deductive models </kwd>
            <kwd>falsification </kwd>
            <kwd>inductive models </kwd>
            <kwd>paradigms</kwd>
            <kwd>philosophy of science</kwd>
            <kwd>religion/science parallels</kwd>
            <kwd>research programs </kwd>
            <kwd>theories of rationality</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <back/>
</article>
