<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/0591-2385.00265</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>What Game Is Being Played? The Need for Clarity about the Relationships Between Scientific and Theological Understanding</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Pailin</surname>
                  <given-names>David A.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2000-03-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>03</month>
            <year>2000</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>35</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2000.35.issue-1</issue-id>
         <fpage>141</fpage>
         <lpage>163</lpage>
         <permissions>
            <copyright-statement>2000 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon</copyright-statement>
         </permissions>
         <abstract>
            <p>This paper investigates the relationship between theology and the natural sciences by considering four realist and five nonrealist interpretations of theological understanding. These are that theology expresses biblical affirmations, the faith of the community, revelatory declarations, or a prioriconclusions, and that it is reducible to expressions of feelings, attitudes, naturalism, liberating praxis, or moral convictions. Because these views are unsatisfactory, the author calls for an imaginative form of natural theology that shows how faith's understanding of the purpose, value, and meaning of reality fits how the world is actually found to be.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>a priori</kwd>
            <kwd>Bible</kwd>
            <kwd>credibility</kwd>
            <kwd>faith</kwd>
            <kwd>game</kwd>
            <kwd>God</kwd>
            <kwd>natural theology</kwd>
            <kwd>nonrealist theology</kwd>
            <kwd>religion and science</kwd>
            <kwd>revelation</kwd>
            <kwd>theism</kwd>
            <kwd>theology</kwd>
            <kwd>understanding</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <back/>
</article>
