<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.2003.00536.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>Demarcation and the Scientistic Fallacy</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Peterson</surname>
                  <given-names>Gregory R.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2003-12-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>12</month>
            <year>2003</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>38</volume>
         <issue>4</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2003.38.issue-4</issue-id>
         <fpage>751</fpage>
         <lpage>761</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract. For many theologians and philosophers, scientism is among the greatest of intellectual sins. In its most commonly cited form, scientism consists in claiming that science is the only source of real knowledge and, therefore, that what science does not discover does not exist. Because the charge of scientism is frequently levied, it is important to be clear about what exactly is being claimed in its name. I argue that scientism can best be understood as a fallacy, specifically as a kind of category mistake. Being clear about this requires an examination of the relationship of scientism to the question of demarcation between science and nonscience, a question that has potential implications for theology.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>demarcation</kwd>
            <kwd>reductionism</kwd>
            <kwd>scientism</kwd>
            <kwd>scientistic fallacy</kwd>
            <kwd>Mikael Stenmark</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="journal">Aronowitz, Stanley, and 
RobertAusch.2000. “A Critique of Methodological Reason. 
<source>Sociological Quarterly 
        </source>41: 699–719.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Barbour, Ian.1997. Religion and Science: Historical and Contemporary Issues. 
            San Francisco
          : HarperCollins.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Crick, Francis.1994. The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul. 
            New York
          : Scribner's.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Fuller, Steven.2002. Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Hefner, Philip.1996. “<source>Theological Perspectives on Morality and Human Evolution 
        </source>.”In
					Theological Perspectives on Morality and Human Evolution., ed.
					W. MarkRichardson
					and
					Wesley J.Wildman. 
            New York
          : Routledge.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Kuhn, Thomas.1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Midgley, Mary.1992. Science as Salvation. 
            London
          : Routledge.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Murphy, Nancey.1990. Theology in the Age of Scientific Reasoning. 
            Ithaca
            , 
            N.Y.
          : Cornell Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Pannenberg, Wolfhart.1976. Theology and the Philosophy of Science. 
            Philadelphia
          : Westminster.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Peacocke, Arthur.1993. Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming—Natural, Divine, and Human. Enlarged ed.
					
            Minneapolis
          : Fortress.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Popper, Karl.1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. 
            New York
          : Basic Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Popper, Karl.1971. The Open Society and Its Enemies. 2 vols. 
            Princeton
            , 
            N.J.
          : Princeton Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="journal">Putnam, Hilary.1997. “A Half Century of Philosophy, Viewed from Within. 
<source>Daedalus 
        </source>126: 175–208.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Sagan, Carl.1980. Cosmos. 
            New York
          : Ballentine.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Smith, Huston.2001. Why Religion Matters: The Fate of the Human Spirit in an Age of Disbelief. 
            San Francisco
          : HarperSanFrancisco.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="book">Stenmark, Mikael.2001. Scientism: Science, Ethics, and Religion. 
            Burlington
            , 
            Vt.
          : Ashgate.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Whitehead, Alfred North. [1925] 1967. Science and the Modern World. 
            New York
          : Free Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
