<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.2004.00587.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>“The End of all our Exploring” in Science and Theology</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Peacocke</surname>
                  <given-names>Arthur</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2004-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>2004</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>39</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2004.39.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>413</fpage>
         <lpage>429</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract. The present malaise of religion—and of theology, its intellectual formulation—in Western society is analyzed, with some personal references, especially with respect to its history in the United Kingdom and the United States. The need for a more open theology that takes account of scientific perspectives is urged. An indication of the understandings of God and of God's relation to the world which result from an exploration starting from scientific perspectives is expounded together with their fruitful relation to some traditional themes. The implications of this for the future of theology are suggested, not least in relation to the new phase, beginning in 2003, of the development of the Zygon Center for Religion and Science. In a concluding reflection the hope is expressed that the shared global experience and perspectives generated by the sciences might form a more common and acceptable starting point than hitherto for the exploration towards God of the seekers of many religious traditions and of none.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>Ian Barbour</kwd>
            <kwd>Ralph Burhoe</kwd>
            <kwd>co‐creating creatures/created co‐creators</kwd>
            <kwd>T. S. Eliot</kwd>
            <kwd>energies of God</kwd>
            <kwd>evolutionary epic</kwd>
            <kwd>Genesis for the third millennium</kwd>
            <kwd>Philip Hefner</kwd>
            <kwd>immanence</kwd>
            <kwd>inference to the best explanation</kwd>
            <kwd>Antje Jackelén</kwd>
            <kwd>New Testament scholarship</kwd>
            <kwd>open theology</kwd>
            <kwd>panentheism</kwd>
            <kwd>postmodernism</kwd>
            <kwd>sociological surveys</kwd>
            <kwd>special divine action</kwd>
            <kwd>theistic naturalism</kwd>
            <kwd>Ultimate Reality</kwd>
            <kwd>Wisdom of God</kwd>
            <kwd>Word (Logos) of God</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Clayton, Philip, and 
ArthurPeacocke, eds. 
2004. In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God's Presence in a Scientific World. 
            Grand Rapids
          : Wm. B. Eerdmans.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Dawkins, Richard. 1999. Unweaving the Rainbow. 
            London
          : Penguin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="journal">Deane‐Drummond, Celia. 1999. “Futurenatural?: A Future of Science through the Lens of Wisdom. 
<source>Heythrop J. 
        </source>XL: 41–59.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Dunn, J. G.1980. Christology in the Making. 
            London
          : SCM Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Gill, Robin. 2001. “<source>The Future of Religious Participation and Belief in Britain and Beyond 
        </source>.”In
					The Blackwell Companion in Sociology of Religion, ed. 
R. K.Fenn, 279–91. 
            Oxford
          : Blackwell.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Habgood, John. 1963. “<source>The Uneasy Truce between Science and Religion 
        </source>.”In
					Soundings, ed. 
A. R.Vidler, 21–41. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Holloway, Richard. 2000. Church Times, 17 March.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Houlden, Leslie. 2002. The Strange Story of the Gospels: Finding Doctrine through Narrative. 
            London
          : SPCK.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="journal">Larson, E. J., and 
L.Witham. 1997. “Scientists Are Still Keeping the Faith. 
<source>Nature 
        </source>386: 435–36.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="journal">Larson, E. J., and 
L.Witham. 1998. “Leading Scientists Still Reject God. 
<source>Nature 
        </source>394: 313.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Lloyd, John. 1997. The Times, 19 September.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Lossky, V.1991. The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church. 
            Cambridge
          : James Clarke. (English ed.)</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Mangum, John M., ed. 
1989. The New Faith‐Science Debate. 
            Minneapolis
          : Fortress; Geneva: WCC Publications.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Moore, Aubrey. [1889] 1891. Lux Mundi. 12th ed.
					
            London
          : John Murray.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Peacocke, Arthur. [1979] 2004. Creation and the World of Science. 
            Oxford
          : Clarendon.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="journal">Peacocke, Arthur. 2000. “Science and the Future of Theology: Critical Issues. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>35 (March): 119–40.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Peacocke, Arthur. 2001. Paths from Science towards God: the End of All Our Exploring. 
            Oxford
          : Oneworld.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="journal">Phillips, Anthony. 1986. “The Bible as a Record of Faith. 
<source>The Times 
        </source>, April 5.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Richardson, W. M., 
R. J.Russell, 
P.Clayton, and 
K.Wegter‐McNelly, eds. 
2002. Science and the Spiritual Quest: New Essays by Leading Scientists. 
            London and New York
          : Routledge.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="book">Sagan, Carl.1995. Pale Blue Dot. 
            London
          : Headline.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b21">
            <mixed-citation id="cit21" publication-type="book">Saunders, Nicholas. 2003. Divine Action and Modern Science. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b22">
            <mixed-citation id="cit22" publication-type="book">Temple, William. [1934] 1964. Nature, Man and God. 
            London
          : Macmillan.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b23">
            <mixed-citation id="cit23" publication-type="book">Theissen, Gerd, and 
AnnetteMetz. 1998. The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide. 
            London
          : SCM Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b24">
            <mixed-citation id="cit24" publication-type="book">Ward, Keith. 1994. Religion and Revelation. 
            Oxford
          : Clarendon.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b25">
            <mixed-citation id="cit25" publication-type="journal">Young, Hugo. 2000. “The Churches Are Empty, Yet Materialism Is Not Enough. 
<source>Guardian 
        </source>, 1 January.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
