<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00679.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>THEOLOGY AND PHYSICS FORTY YEARS LATER</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Barbour</surname>
                  <given-names>Ian G.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2005-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>2005</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>40</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2005.40.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>507</fpage>
         <lpage>512</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  Almost forty years later I look back on a 1966 article on theology and physics by Sanford Brown and my response published with it. I reflect on his hope that theological seminaries would give attention to the methods used in scientific inquiry. I compare our comments with subsequent thought on three issues: (1) the role of models in science and religion; (2) the relation of wholes to parts in physics and other sciences and the debate over reductionism and emergence; and (3) the implications of quantum physics for theology, including the possibility of divine action at the quantum level.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>Sanford Brown</kwd>
            <kwd>divine action</kwd>
            <kwd>emergence</kwd>
            <kwd>indeterminacy</kwd>
            <kwd>levels</kwd>
            <kwd>models</kwd>
            <kwd>quantum theory</kwd>
            <kwd>reductionism</kwd>
            <kwd>wholes and parts</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="journal">Barbour, Ian G.1966a. “Commentary on Theological Resources from the Physical Sciences. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>1 (March): 27–30.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Barbour, Ian G.1966b. Issues in Science and Religion. 
            Englewood Cliffs
            , 
            N.J.
          : Prentice Hall.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Barbour, Ian G.1974. Myths, Models and Paradigms. 
            London
          : SCM Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Barbour, Ian G.1990. Religion in an Age of Science. 
            San Francisco
          : HarperSanFrancisco.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="journal">Brown, Sanford1966. “Theological Resources from the Physical Sciences: Can Physics Contribute to Theology<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>1 (March): 14–21.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Clayton, Philip2004. Mind and Emergence: From Quantum to Consciousness. 
            Oxford
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Gregersen, Niels Henrik2003. “<source>From Anthropic Design to Self‐Organized Complexity 
        </source>.”In
					From Complexity to Life: On the Emergence of Life and Meaning, ed. 
Niels HenrikGregersen. 
            Oxford
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">McFague, Sallie1982. Metaphorical Theology: Models of God in Religious Language. 
            Philadelphia
          : Fortress.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Murphy, Nancey1996. Beyond Liberalism and Fundamentalism: How Modern and Postmodern Philosophy Set the Theological Agenda. 
            Valley Forge
            , 
            Pa.
          : Trinity Press International.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Niekerk, Kees van Kooten2003. “<source>Critical Realism 
        </source>.”In
					Encyclopedia of Science and Religion, ed. 
J.Wentzel van Huyssteen, 190–93. 
            New York
          : Macmillan Reference.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Peacocke, Arthur1984. Intimations of Reality: Critical Realism in Science and Religion. 
            Notre Dame
            , 
            Ind.
          : Univ. of Notre Dame Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Peacocke, Arthur1993. Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming—Natural, Divine, and Human. 
            Minneapolis
          : Fortress.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Peacocke, Arthur2001. Paths from Science Towards God: The End of All our Exploring. 
            Oxford
          : Oneworld.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Polkinghorne, John1991. Reason and Reality: The Relationship between Science and Theology. 
            Philadelphia
          : Trinity Press International.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Russell, Robert John, 
PhilipClayton, 
KirkWegter‐McNelly, and 
JohnPolkinghorne, eds. 
2001. Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. 
            Vatican City State
            : 
            Vatican Observatory
          , and
					
            Berkeley
            , 
            Calif.
          : Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
