<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00709.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>RETHINKING THE SECULAR: SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND RELIGION TODAY</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Szerszynski</surname>
                  <given-names>Bronislaw</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2005-12-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>12</month>
            <year>2005</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>40</volume>
         <issue>4</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2005.40.issue-4</issue-id>
         <fpage>813</fpage>
         <lpage>822</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  Contemporary tensions between science and religion cannot simply be seen as a manifestation of an eternal tension between reason and revelation. Instead, the modern secular, including science and technology, needs to be seen as a distinctive historical phenomenon, produced and still radically conditioned by the religious history of the West. Clashes between religion and science thus ought to be seen fundamentally as part of a dialogue that is internal to Western religious history. While largely agreeing with Caiazza's account of the “magical” understanding of technology, I suggest that this needs to be seen as part of a more fundamental drift in religion and culture away from canonical meanings to more “indexical,” pragmatic ones—but also that technology is still inflected by soteriological meanings that were coded into modern technology at its very inception in the early modern period. I conclude by arguing that a recognition of science and technology's grounding in Western religious history can make possible a more fundamental encounter with religion.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>John Caiazza</kwd>
            <kwd>religion</kwd>
            <kwd>the sacred</kwd>
            <kwd>science</kwd>
            <kwd>the secular</kwd>
            <kwd>technology</kwd>
            <kwd>Western religious history</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Bacon, Francis. [1605] 1960. The Advancement of Learning, and New Atlantis. 
            London
          : Oxford Univ. Press.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Brooke, John H.1991. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Brown, Nik, 
Brian, Rappert, and 
Andrew, Webster, eds. 
2000. Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno‐Science. 
            Aldershot
            , 
            U.K.
          : Ashgate.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="journal">Caiazza, John C.2005. “Athens, Jerusalem, and the Arrival of Techno‐Secularism. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>40 (March): 9–21.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Deane‐Drummond, Celia, and 
BronislawSzerszynski, eds. 
2003. Re‐Ordering Nature: Theology, Society and the New Genetics. 
            Edinburgh
          : T&amp; T Clark.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Funkenstein, Amos.1986. Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century. 
            Princeton
            , 
            N.J.
          : Princeton Univ. Press.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Gadamer, Hans‐Georg.1975. Truth and Method. 
            New York
          : Seabury.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Gauchet, Marcel.1997. The Disenchantment of the World: A Political History of Religion. Trans. Oscar Burge.
					
            Princeton
            , 
            N.J.
          : Princeton Univ. Press.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Heelas, Paul, 
LindaWoodhead, 
Benjamin, Seel, 
Bronislaw, Szerszynski, and 
Karin, Tusting.2004. The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion Is Giving Way to Spirituality. 
            Oxford
          : Blackwell.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Jaspers, Karl.1953. The Origin and Goal of History. 
            London
          : Routledge and Kegan Paul.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Latour, Bruno.2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Trans. Catherine Porter.
					
            Cambridge
          : Harvard Univ. Press.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Manchester, Peter.1993. “<source>Time in Christianity 
        </source>.”In
					Religion and Time, ed. 
AninditaNiyogiBalslev and 
Jitendranath, Mohanty, 109–37.
            Leiden
          : E. J. Brill.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="journal">Mandelbaum, David G.1966. “Transcendental and Pragmatic Aspects of Religion. 
<source>American Anthropologist 
        </source>68: 1174–91.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Milbank, John.1990. Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason. 
            Oxford
          : Blackwell.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Nye, David E.1994. American Technological Sublime. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="journal">Polkinghorne, John.2005. “The Continuing Interaction of Science and Religion. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>40 (March): 43–50.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="journal">Rappaport, Roy A.1993. “Veracity, Verity and <italic>Verum</italic> in Liturgy. 
<source>Studia Liturgica 
        </source>23: 35–50.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="book">Ross, Andrew, ed. 
1996. Science Wars. 
            Durham
            , 
            N.C.
          : Duke Univ. Press.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Szerszynski, Bronislaw.2005. Nature, Technology and the Sacred. 
            Oxford
          : Blackwell.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="journal">Tirosh‐Samuelson, Hava.2005. “Rethinking the Past and Anticipating the Future of Religion and Science. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>40 (March): 33–41.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b21">
            <mixed-citation id="cit21" publication-type="book">vanGennep, Arnold.1960. <source>The Rites of Passage 
        </source>. 
Trans. Monika Vizedom and Gebrielle Caffee. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
