<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00740.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>CYBORG: MYTH OR REALITY?</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Geertsema</surname>
                  <given-names>Henk G.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2006-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>2006</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>41</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2006.41.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>289</fpage>
         <lpage>328</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  The idea of cyborg often is taken as a token for the distinction between human and machine having become irrelevant. In this essay I argue against that view. I critically analyze empirical arguments, theoretical reflections, and ultimate convictions that are supposed to support the idea. I show that empirical arguments at this time rather point in a different direction and that theoretical views behind it are at least questionable. I also show that the ultimate convictions presupposed deny basic tenets of traditional Christianity, while their claim to be based on science confuses scientific results with their interpretation on the basis of a naturalistic world‐view.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>consciousness</kwd>
            <kwd>cyborg</kwd>
            <kwd>Donna Haraway</kwd>
            <kwd>human‐machine</kwd>
            <kwd>influence of ultimate beliefs</kwd>
            <kwd>information</kwd>
            <kwd>methodological naturalism</kwd>
            <kwd>ontology</kwd>
            <kwd>origin</kwd>
            <kwd>philosophy of mind</kwd>
            <kwd>physicalism</kwd>
            <kwd>technology</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Anderson, Ray S.1982. On Being Human: Essays in Theological Anthropology. 
            Grand Rapids
            , 
            Mich.
          : Eerdmans.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Armstrong, D. M.1995. “<source>Postscript: ‘Naturalism, Materialism, and First Philosophy’ Reconsidered 
        </source>.”In
					Contemporary Materialism. A Reader, ed. 
PaulMoser and 
J. D.Tout, 47–50. 
            London
          : Routledge.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Ayala, Francisco J.1998. “<source>Human Nature: One Evolutionist's View 
        </source>.”In
					Whatever Happened to the Soul? Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature, ed. 
Warren S.Brown, 
NancyMurphy, and 
H. NewtonMalony, 31–48. 
            Minneapolis
          : Fortress.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Behe, Michael. 1996. Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. 
            New York
          : Free Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Brown, Warren S., 
NanceyMurphy, and 
H. NewtonMaloney, eds. 
1998. Whatever Happened to the Soul? Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature. 
            Minneapolis
          : Fortress.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Clark, Andy. 2003. Natural‐born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Clouser, Roy A. [1991] 2005. The Myth of Religious Neutrality of Science: An Essay on the Hidden Role of Religious Belief in Theories. 2d rev. ed.
					
            Notre Dame
            , 
            Ind.
          : Univ. of Notre Dame Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Clynes, M., and 
N.Kline. [1960] 1995. “<source>Cyborgs and Space 
        </source>.”In
					The Cyborg Handbook, ed. 
C.Gray, 29–34. 
            London
          : Routledge.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Coolen, M.1992. De machine voorbij (Beyond the Machine). 
            Amsterdam
          : Boom.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Davidson, Donald. 1980. Essays on Action and Events. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">De Garis, Hugo. 2001. “<source>Artificial Brains and Species Dominance 
        </source>. 
Lecture at Robo Sapiens, USKCI Incognito Symposium on Embodied Intelligence, 
            Utrecht
          , April 4).</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Dembski, William. 2002. No Free Lunch: Why Sped fled Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. 
            Lanham
            , 
            Md.
          : Rowman and Littlefield.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Dennett, Daniel C.1991. Consciousness Explained. 
            Boston
          : Little.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Dooyeweerd, Herman. [19531958] 1997. A New Critique of Theoretical Thought. Vol.1: The necessary presuppositions of philosophy. Vol. 2: The general theory of the modal spheres. Vol. 3: The structures of individuality of temporal reality. 
            Lewiston
            , 
            N.Y.
          : Edwin Mellen.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Geertsema, Henk G.1996. “<source>Faith and Science in Biblical Perspective: Human Responsibility before God 
        </source>.”In
					Facets of Faith &amp; Science. Volume 4: Interpreting God's Action in the World, ed. 
Jitse M.Van Der Meer, 285–312. 
            Lanham
            , 
            Md.
          : University Press of America.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="book">Geertsema, Henk G.2000. “<source>Science and Person: Beyond the Cartesian Paradigm 
        </source>.”In
					Studies in Science and Theology. Yearbook of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology 1999–2000, ed. 
Niels HenrikGregersen, 
UlfGörman, and 
Willem B.Drees, 47–64. 
            Aarhus
            , 
            Denmark
          : Univ. of Aarhus Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="journal">Geertsema, Henk G.2002. “Which Causality? Whose Explanation<source>Philosophia Reformata 
        </source>67: 173–85.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="book">Gray, C., ed. 
1995. The Cyborg Handbook. 
            London
          : Routledge.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Gregersen, Niels Henrik, 
Willem B.Drees, and 
UlfGörman, eds. 
2000. The Human Person in Science and Theology. 
            Edinburgh
          : T &amp; T Clark.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="journal">Haraway, Donna J. [1985] 1991. “Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. 
<source>Socialist Review 
        </source>80 (1985), 65–108. Reprinted as “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century,” in Donna J. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–81. London: Free Associations Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b21">
            <mixed-citation id="cit21" publication-type="book">Haraway, Donna J.1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. 
            London
          : Free Associations Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b22">
            <mixed-citation id="cit22" publication-type="book">Haraway, Donna J.2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. 
            Chicago
          : Prickly Paradigm Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b23">
            <mixed-citation id="cit23" publication-type="book">Hart, Hendrik. 1984. Understanding Our World: An Integral Ontology. 
            Lanham
            , 
            Md.
          : University Press of America.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b24">
            <mixed-citation id="cit24" publication-type="book">Heil, J., and 
A.Mele, eds. 
1993. Mental Causation. 
            Oxford
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b25">
            <mixed-citation id="cit25" publication-type="book">Heschel, Abraham J.1966. Who is Man?
            Stanford
            , 
            Calif.
          : Stanford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b26">
            <mixed-citation id="cit26" publication-type="book">Hofstadter, Douglas R.1981. “<source>Reflections 
        </source>.”In
					The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul, composed and arranged by 
D. R.Hofstadter and 
D. C.Dennett, 373–82. 
            London
          : Penguin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b27">
            <mixed-citation id="cit27" publication-type="book">Howell, Russell W., and 
W. JamesBradley, eds. 
2001. Mathematics in a Postmodern Age. 
            Grand Rapids
            , 
            Mich.
          : Eerdmans.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b28">
            <mixed-citation id="cit28" publication-type="book">Kaiser, Christopher. 1991. Creation and the History of Science. 
            London
          : Marshall Pickering, and Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b29">
            <mixed-citation id="cit29" publication-type="book">Kant, Immanuel. [1798] 1970. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Immanuel Kant Werke in sechs Bänden. Band V. 
            Darmstadt
          : Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b30">
            <mixed-citation id="cit30" publication-type="book">Kim, Jaegwon. 2000. Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind‐Body Problem and Mental Causation. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b31">
            <mixed-citation id="cit31" publication-type="other">Kunzru, Hari. 1997. “<source>You Are Cyborg 
        </source>.”Interview with Donna Haraway. Wired. <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.02/ffharaway">http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.02/ffharaway</ext-link>.)</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b32">
            <mixed-citation id="cit32" publication-type="book">Kurzweil, Ray. 1999. The Age of Spiritual Machines. 
            New York
          : Viking Penguin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b33">
            <mixed-citation id="cit33" publication-type="book">Löwith, Karl. 1953. Weltgeschichte und Heilsgeschehen. 
            Stuttgart
          : Kohlhammer.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b34">
            <mixed-citation id="cit34" publication-type="book">McFadyen, Alistair I.1990. The Call to Personhood: A Christian Theory of the Individual in Social Relationships. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b35">
            <mixed-citation id="cit35" publication-type="book">McMullin, Ernan. 2002. “<source>Plantinga's Defense of Special Creation 
        </source>.”In
					Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Perspectives, ed. 
Robert T.Pennock, 165–96. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b36">
            <mixed-citation id="cit36" publication-type="book">Midgley, Mary. 2000. “<source>Consciousness, Fatalism, and Science 
        </source>.”In
					The Human Person in Science and Theology, ed. 
Niels HenrikGregersen, 
Willem B.Drees, and 
UlfGörman, 21–40. 
            Edinburgh
          : T &amp; T Clark.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b37">
            <mixed-citation id="cit37" publication-type="book">Moltmann, J.1980. Trinität und Reich Gottes. 
            München
          : Kaiser Verlag.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b38">
            <mixed-citation id="cit38" publication-type="book">Moravec, Hans. 1988. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. 
            Cambridge
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b39">
            <mixed-citation id="cit39" publication-type="book">Murphy, Nancey. 1998. “<source>Nonreductive Physicalism: Philosophical Issues 
        </source>.”In
					Whatever Happened to the Soul? Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature, ed. 
Warren S.Brown, 
NanceyMurphy, and 
H. NewtonMaloney, 127–48. 
            Minneapolis
          : Fortress.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b40">
            <mixed-citation id="cit40" publication-type="book">Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. 
            Oxford
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b41">
            <mixed-citation id="cit41" publication-type="book">Nauta, D.1972. The Meaning of Information. 
            Den Haag
          : Mouton.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b42">
            <mixed-citation id="cit42" publication-type="book">Noble, David F.1999. The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention. 
            New York
          : Penguin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b43">
            <mixed-citation id="cit43" publication-type="book">Paul, Gregory S., and 
EarlCox. 1996. Beyond Humanity: Cyber Evolution and Future Minds. 
            Rockland
            , 
            Mass.
          : Charles River Media.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b44">
            <mixed-citation id="cit44" publication-type="book">Pennock, Robert T., ed. 
2002. Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Perspectives. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b45">
            <mixed-citation id="cit45" publication-type="book">Plantinga, Alvin. [1996] 2002. “<source>Methodological Naturalism 
        </source>.”In
					Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Perspectives, ed. 
Robert T.Pennock, 338–61. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b46">
            <mixed-citation id="cit46" publication-type="book">Plantinga, Alvin. 2002. “<source>When Faith and Reason Clash 
        </source>.”In
					Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Perspectives, ed. 
Robert T.Pennock, 113–46. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b47">
            <mixed-citation id="cit47" publication-type="book">Poli, R.2001. ALWIS: Ontology for Knowledge Engineers. Ph.D. diss., Utrecht University).</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b48">
            <mixed-citation id="cit48" publication-type="book">Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b49">
            <mixed-citation id="cit49" publication-type="book">Ruse, Michael. 2001. “<source>Methodological Naturalism under Attack 
        </source>.”In
					Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Perspectives, ed. 
Robert T.Pennock, 363–86. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b50">
            <mixed-citation id="cit50" publication-type="book">Schuurman, E.2003. Faith and Hope in Technology. 
            Toronto
            , 
            Canada
          : Clements.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b51">
            <mixed-citation id="cit51" publication-type="book">Searle, John R.1981. “<source>Minds, Brains, and Programs 
        </source>.”In
					The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul, composed and arranged by 
D. R.Hofstadter and 
D. C.Dennett, 353–73. 
            London
          : Penguin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b52">
            <mixed-citation id="cit52" publication-type="book">Searle, John R.1994. The Rediscovery of the Mind. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b53">
            <mixed-citation id="cit53" publication-type="journal">Strijbos, Sytse. 2003. “Systems Thinking and the Disclosure of a Technological Society: Some Philosophical Reflections. 
<source>Systems Research 
        </source>20: 119–31.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b54">
            <mixed-citation id="cit54" publication-type="book">Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b55">
            <mixed-citation id="cit55" publication-type="book">Vinge, Vernor. 1993. “The Singularity.”Paper presented at the VISION‐21 Symposium, sponsored by
					The NASA Lewis Research Center and the Ohio Aerospace Institute, 30‐31 March. <ext-link xlink:href="http://kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu/~kamikaze.doc.vinge.html">http://kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu/~kamikaze.doc.vinge.html</ext-link>.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
