<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00749.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>TELEOLOGY PAST AND PRESENT</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Wattles</surname>
                  <given-names>Jeffrey</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2006-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>2006</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>41</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2006.41.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>445</fpage>
         <lpage>464</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Abstract.  Current teleology in Western biology, philosophy, and theology draws on resources from four main Western philosophers. (1) Plato's Timaeus shows how to interpret the universe as the handiwork of a purposive Creator who subordinates secondary, necessary, causes to primary, intelligent, causes. (2) Aristotle's Physics sets forth purpose as implicit in the nature of things. Purposes of different sorts inhere in different types of being, and everything has a natural function. Living things grow to actualize the potentials of the goal whose principle they bear within themselves. (3) Kant's Critique of Judgment denies that purpose is anything that human beings can know, strictly speaking. Nevertheless, purpose is a concept we must use to make sense of biological systems. (4) Hegel's Philosophy of Nature articulates organic systems as dialectically including and transcending mechanical and chemical systems. Teleological themes persist, in different ways, in contemporary discussions; I consider two lines of criticism of traditional teleology—by Richard Dawkins and Stephen Jay Gould—and one line that continues traditional teleology in an updated way—by Holmes Rolston, III.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>Aristotle</kwd>
            <kwd>design</kwd>
            <kwd>G. W. F. Hegel</kwd>
            <kwd>Immanuel Kant</kwd>
            <kwd>Plato</kwd>
            <kwd>purpose</kwd>
            <kwd>Holmes Rolston, III</kwd>
            <kwd>teleology</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Ed. 
JonathanBarnes. Vol 1. 
            Princeton
            , 
            N.J.
          : Princeton Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Barbour, Ian G.1990. Religion in an Age of Science. 
            San Francisco
          : Harper and Row.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Bodéüs, Richard. 2000. Aristotle and the Theology of the Living Immortals. 
            Albany
          : State Univ. of New York Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Boorse, Christopher. 2002. “<source>A Rebuttal on Functions 
        </source>.”In
					Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, ed. 
André Ariew, Robert Cummins, and 
MarkPerlman, 63–112. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Brisson, Luc, and 
F. WalterMeyerstein. 1995. Inventing the Universe. 
            Albany
          : State Univ. of New York Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Brooke, John Hedley.1991. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Davies, Paul. 1994. The Last Three Minutes: Conjectures about the Ultimate Fate of the Universe. 
            New York
          : Basic Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Grene, Marjorie. 1968. Approaches to a Philosophical Biology. 
            New York
          : Basic Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Hardcastle, Valerie Gray.1999. “<source>Understanding Functions: A Pragmatic Approach 
        </source>.”In
					Where Biology Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays, ed. 
V. G.Hardcastle, 27–43. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Hardcastle, Valerie Gray.2002. “<source>On the Normativity in Functions 
        </source>.”In
					Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, ed. 
AndréAriew, 
RobertCummins, and 
MarkPerlman, 144–56. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Hart, James G.2005. “<source>Entelechy in Transcendental Phenomenology 
        </source>.”In
					Edmund Husserl: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, vol. V, ed. 
RudolfBernet, 
DonnWelton, and 
GinaZavota, 246–68. 
            New York
          : Routledge.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Haught, John F.1995. Science and Religion: From Conflict to Conversation. 
            New York
          : Paulist.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Hegel, G. W. F. [1830] 1991. The Encyclopedia Logic. Trans. 
T. F.Geraets, 
W. A.Suchting, and 
H. S.Harris. 
            Indianapolis
          : Hackett.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Hegel, G. W. F. [1830] 1970. Philosophy of Nature. Trans. 
A. V.Miller. 
            Oxford
          : Clarendon.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Hegel, G. W. F. [19121916] 1969. Science of Logic. Trans. 
A. V.Miller. 
            New York
          : Humanities.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="book">Husserl, Edmund. [1954] 1970. The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Trans. 
DavidCarr. 
            Evanston
          : Northwestern Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Kant, Immanuel. [1781] 1963. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. 
Norman KempSmith. 
            London
          : Macmillan.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="book">Kant, Immanuel. [1790] 1987. Critique of Judgment. Trans. 
Werner S.Pluhar. 
            Indianapolis
          : Hackett.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Kitcher, Philip. 1998. “<source>Function and Design 
        </source>.”In
					Nature's Purposes, ed. 
ColinAllen, 
MarcBekoff, and 
GeorgeLauder, 479–503. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="book">McGrath, Alister E.1999. Science and Religion: An Introduction. 
            Oxford
          : Blackwell.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b21">
            <mixed-citation id="cit21" publication-type="book">McNeill, William. 1999. “<source>Life beyond the Organism: Animal Being in Heidegger's Freiburg Lectures, 1929–30 
        </source>.”In
					Animal Others, ed. 
H. PeterSteeves, 197–248. 
            Albany
          : State Univ. of New York Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b22">
            <mixed-citation id="cit22" publication-type="book">Miller, Mitchell H.Jr. [1986] 1991. Plato's Parmenides. 
            University Park
          : Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b23">
            <mixed-citation id="cit23" publication-type="book">Miller, Mitchell H.Jr.2002. “<source>The <italic>Timaeus</italic> and the ‘Longer Way.’ 
        </source>”In
					Plato's Timaeus as Cultural Icon, ed. 
Gretchen J.Reydams‐Schils. 
            South Bend
            , 
            Ind.
          : Univ. of Notre Dame Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b24">
            <mixed-citation id="cit24" publication-type="journal">Peterson, Gregory F.2000. “Whose Evolution? Which Theology<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>35 (June): 221–32.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b25">
            <mixed-citation id="cit25" publication-type="book">Plato. 2000a. Collected Dialogues. 
            Indianapolis
          : Hackett.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b26">
            <mixed-citation id="cit26" publication-type="book">Plato. 2000b. Timaeus. Trans. 
Donald J.Zeyl. 
            Indianapolis
          : Hackett.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b27">
            <mixed-citation id="cit27" publication-type="book">Polanyi, Michael. 1962. Personal Knowledge. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b28">
            <mixed-citation id="cit28" publication-type="book">Rolston, Holmes, III.1999. Genes, Genesis and God: Values and Their Origins in Natural and Human History. 
            Cambridge
            , 
            U.K.
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b29">
            <mixed-citation id="cit29" publication-type="book">Wattles, Jeffrey. 1973. Hegel's Philosophy of Organic Nature. Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b30">
            <mixed-citation id="cit30" publication-type="book">Whitehead, Alfred North. [192728] 1978. Process and Reality. Corrected ed., ed. 
David RayGriffin and 
Donald W.Sherburne. 
            New York
          : Free Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b31">
            <mixed-citation id="cit31" publication-type="book">Whitehead, Alfred North. [1933] 1967. Adventures of Ideas. 
            New York
          : Free Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
