<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.2006.00782.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>THEOLOGY AND THE SCIENCE WARS: WHO OWNS HUMAN NATURE?</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Peterson</surname>
                  <given-names>Gregory R.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2006-12-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>12</month>
            <year>2006</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>41</volume>
         <issue>4</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2006.41.issue-4</issue-id>
         <fpage>853</fpage>
         <lpage>862</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <abstract>
            <p>Lluís Oviedo examines in his article the current conflict over human nature and the role of the sciences in the debate, suggesting that there may be a role for theology to play as well. In this essay I examine and respond to some aspects of Oviedo's article and suggest that the nature of the conflict needs to be nuanced to understand it as a conflict not between scientific and philosophical/social‐scientific views of human nature but among scientists, social scientists, and philosophers over the role of science in thinking about human nature. I analyze some of the obstacles for theology's becoming involved and propose that thinking about what are distinctively theological questions as opposed to scientific ones may be an appropriate starting point.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>biocognitivism</kwd>
            <kwd>cognitive science of religion</kwd>
            <kwd>Lluís Oviedo</kwd>
            <kwd>science wars</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Barkow, Jerome H., 
LedaCosmides, and 
JohnTooby.1992. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. 
            New York
          : Basic Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Dawkins, Richard. [1976] 1989. The Selfish Gene. 2d ed.
					
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Dawkins, Richard. 1996. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design. 
            New York
          : W. W. Norton.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Dawkins, Richard. 2004. A Devils Chaplain: Reflections on Hopes, Lies, Science, and Love. 
            New York
          : Mariner.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Dennett, Daniel. 1991. Consciousness Explained. 
            Boston
          : Little, Brown.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Dennett, Daniel. 1995. Darwins Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. 
            New York
          : Touchstone.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Dennett, Daniel. 2006. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. 
            New York
          : Viking.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Haught, John. 2003. Deeper than Darwin: The Prospect for Religion in the Age of Evolution. 
            Boulder
            , 
            Colo.
          : Westview.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Kaufman, Gordon. 1993. In the Face of Mystery: A Constructive Theology. 
            Cambridge
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Kurzweil, Ray. 1999. The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. 
            New York
          : Viking.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Lawson, E. Thomas, and 
RobertMcCauley.1993. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. 
            New York
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Lévi‐Strauss, Claude. [1983] 1969. The Raw and the Cooked: Mythologiques. Vol. 1. Trans. John Weightman and Doteen Weightman. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="journal">Oviedo, Lluís. 2006. “Is Christian Theology Well Suited to Enter the Discussion between Science and Humanism<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>41 (December): 825–42.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Peterson, Gregory R.2002. Minding God: Theology and the Cognitive Sciences. 
            Minneapolis
          : Fortress.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="book">Polkinghorne, John. 1996. The Faith of a Physicist: Reflections of a Bottom‐Up Thinker. 
            Minneapolis
          : Fortress.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Rachels, James. 1998. Created from Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="book">Singer, Peter. 2000. A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution, and Cooperation. 
            New Haven
            , 
            Conn.
          : Yale Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Sokal, Alan D., and 
JeanBricmont.1998. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals Abuse of Science. 
            New York
          : Picador.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="book">Wilson, E. O.1978. On Human Nature. 
            Cambridge
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
