<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00951.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>DEVELOPMENT OF OBJECTIVE CRITERIA TO EVALUATE THE AUTHENTICITY OF REVELATION</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Mustafa</surname>
                  <given-names>Tariq</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2008-09-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>09</month>
            <year>2008</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>43</volume>
         <issue>3</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2008.43.issue-3</issue-id>
         <fpage>737</fpage>
         <lpage>744</lpage>
         <permissions>
            <copyright-statement>© 2008 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon</copyright-statement>
         </permissions>
         <abstract>
            <p>Science has been dazzlingly successful in explaining nature. Scientific advances also have led to certain undesirable, though unintended, side effects, one of which is alienation from the spiritual. Revelation comes from the Divine. But what is the status of authenticity of a particular piece claimed to be revelation? What is its historical validity and current state of preservation? This essay proposes to develop a list of rational criteria, in consultation with all stakeholders, for addressing the subject. The aim is to bring objectivity into this discourse by placing it more on the turf of reason rather than basing it on considerations of faith and prior allegiance.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>authentic revelation</kwd>
            <kwd>Creator</kwd>
            <kwd>evaluative framework</kwd>
            <kwd>falsifiable statements</kwd>
            <kwd>logical criteria</kwd>
            <kwd>rational evidence</kwd>
            <kwd>reason</kwd>
            <kwd>revelation</kwd>
            <kwd>SETI project</kwd>
            <kwd>unfavorable side effects of science</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <back/>
</article>
