<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00944.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>MAN OF SCIENCE, MAN OF FAITH: PIERRE DUHEM'S “PHYSIQUE DE CROYANT”</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Deltete</surname>
                  <given-names>Robert J.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2008-09-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>09</month>
            <year>2008</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>43</volume>
         <issue>3</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2008.43.issue-3</issue-id>
         <fpage>627</fpage>
         <lpage>637</lpage>
         <permissions>
            <copyright-statement>© 2008 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon</copyright-statement>
         </permissions>
         <abstract>
            <p>The essay “Physique de croyant” is an important statement of Pierre Duhem's position on the relation between his science and his religion. Duhem trod a difficult path, some might say an impossible one, in Republican France because he was both a physicist and a devout Catholic. In this essay, using “Physique de croyant” as a touchstone, I explore the way in which he tried to reconcile his conflicting allegiances. There are several strands in Duhem's strategy that need to be teased out. First, Duhem sought to defend his science against the charge that it was materialist and atheist. He did this with his claim, usually called the autonomy thesis, that physics and metaphysics are fundamentally different enterprises—that physics, properly conducted, has no metaphysical implications and requires no metaphysical support. This did not deny metaphysics its rightful territory. Second, Duhem used his segregationist position to defend the Roman Catholic Church against the assaults of the positivist scientism then in favor with the Republicans. Third, he also sought to protect his science against fellow Catholics who wanted to use it for polemical purposes. I develop and evaluate these lines of defense.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>Pierre Duhem</kwd>
            <kwd>natural classification</kwd>
            <kwd>Abel Rey</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Ariew, Roger, and 
PeterBarker, eds. 
1996. Pierre Duhem: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science. 
            Indianapolis
          : Hackett.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Brenner, Anastasios. 1990. Duhem: science, realité et apparence. 
            Paris
          : Vrin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Brenner, Anastasios. 2003. Les origines francaises de laphilosophie des sciences. 
            Paris
          : Presses Universitaires de France.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="journal">Deltete, Robert. 2004. “Duhem and Natural Classification: A Critical Appreciation. 
<source>Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 
        </source>44:32–78.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Deltete, Robert, and 
AnastasiosBrenner. 2004. <source>Essay Review of Pierre Duhem 
        </source>, Le mixte et la combinasion chimique, ed. and trans, with an Intro. by 
PaulNeedham. 
            Dordrecht
          : Kluwer.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b27">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="journal">2003. In
					<source>Foundations of Chemistry 
        </source>6:203–32.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="journal">Duhem, Pierre. 1892. “Commentaire aux principes de la thermodynamique. 
<source>Journal de mathématiques pures et appliquées 
        </source>1:8:269–330.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="journal">Duhem, Pierre. 1893a. “Une nouvelle théorie du monde inorganique. 
<source>Revue des questions scientifques 
        </source>33:90–133.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="journal">Duhem, Pierre. 1893b. “Physique et métaphysique. 
<source>Revue des questions scientifiques 
        </source>34:55–83.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="journal">Duhem, Pierre. 1893c. “L'ecole anglaise et les theories physiques, à propos d'un livre récent de W. Thomson. 
<source>Revue de questions scientifiques 
        </source>34:345–78.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="journal">Duhem, Pierre. 1896. “L'évolution des théories physiques du 17me siécle jusqu'a nos jours. 
<source>Revue des questions scientifiques 
        </source>11:463–99.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Duhem, Pierre. [1903] 1905. L'évolution de la méchanique. 
            Paris
          : Herman.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Duhem, Pierre. 19051906. Les origines de la statique: Les sources de théories physiques. 2 vols. 
            Paris
          : A. Herman.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Duhem, Pierre. [] 1914. “<source>Physique de croyant 
        </source>”. In
					La theorie physique, son objet—sa structure, 2d ed., 413–72. 
            Paris
          : Chevalier et Revière.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Duhem, Pierre. [1906] 1914. La theorie physique, son objet—sa structure. 2d ed. 
            Paris
          : Chevalier et Revière.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="book">Duhem, Pierre. 1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. English trans, of Duhem 1914 by 
P. P.Weiner. 
            Princeton
            , 
            N.J.
          : Princeton Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Gutting, Gary. 2001. French Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="book">Martin, R. N. D.1991. Pierre Duhem: Philosophy and History in the Work of a Believing Physicist. 
            La Salle
            , 
            Ill.
          : Open Court.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Paul, Harry. 1979. The Edge of Contingency: French Catholic Reaction to Scientific Change from Darwin to Duhem. 
            Gainesville
          : Univ. of Florida Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="journal">Rey, Abel. 1904. “La philosophie scientifique de M. Duhem. 
<source>Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale 
        </source>xii (November): 699–744.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit21" publication-type="journal">Rey, Abel. 1906. “La physique de M. Duhem. 
<source>Annales de Philosophie Chrétienne 
        </source>cli: 535–37.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b21">
            <mixed-citation id="cit22" publication-type="book">Rey, Abel. 1907. La theorie de la physique chez les physiciens contemporains. 
            Paris
          : Alcan.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
