ZYGO Zygon® 0591-2385 1467-9744 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.00993.x OAKESHOTT ON SCIENCE AS A MODE OF EXPERIENCE Kaldis Byron 02 03 2009 44 1 10.1111/zygo.2009.44.issue-1 169 196 © 2009 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon

I offer a critical exposition and reconstruction of Michael Oakeshott's views on natural science. The principal aim is to enrich Oakeshott's modal schema by throwing light on it in terms of its internal consistency and by bringing to bear on it recent developments in philosophy in general and the philosophy of science in particular. The discussion brings out the special place reserved for philosophy, the crucial tenet of the separateness of these modes seen as Leibnizian monads as well as the special status allowed to science. It considers the possibility of combining one moment of philosophical thinking, namely ethics, with science in the midst of such modal separateness. I first offer a general introduction of how to approach Oakeshott's views on science. The next section stresses philosophy and its relation to science. This is followed by an elaboration of what the modes of experience are meant to be and how science is placed among them. An examination of Oakeshott's more particular views on science concludes the essay.

 definition designation ethics holism mode of experience naturalism naturalized epistemology Michael Oakeshott philosophy of science religion science Bradley, F. H. [1893] 1978. Appearance and Reality. Oxford : Clarendon. Hacking, Ian. 1991. “A Tradition of Natural Kinds.Philosophical Studies  61:109–26. Hacking, Ian. 2007. “Natural Kinds: Rosy Dawn, Scholastic Twilight.Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements  , 203–39. Hegel, G. W. F. [1821] 1952. Philosophy of Right. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press. Husserl, Edmund. 1965. Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. New York : Harper and Row. James, William. [1902] 2002. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York : Prometheus Books. Kaldis, Byron. 2008. “Technoscience and Religious Sin: Orthodox Theology and Heidegger.Sophia: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Metaphysical Theology, and Ethics  47:107–28. Kaldis, Byron. In press. “Religion and Art: Modal Formalism and Political Antinomies.  ” In The Meanings of Michael Oakeshott's Conservatism, ed. CoreyAbel. Thorverton , England : Imprint Academic. Kuhn, Thomas S.1986. “Possible Worlds in History of Science.  ” Public lecture. From MIT Library. Kuhn, Thomas S.1987. “The Presence of Past Science.  ” Public lecture. From MIT Library. Marsh, Leslie. 2005. “Constructivism and Relativism in Oakeshott.  ” In The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott, ed. CoreyAbel and TimothyFuller, 238–62. Thorverton , England : Imprint Academic. Oakeshott, Michael. 1933. Experience and Its Modes. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press. Oakeshott, Michael. [c. 1946] 1993. “A Philosophy of Politics.  ” In Religion, Politics and the Moral Life, ed. TimothyFuller, 119–37. New Haven : Yale Univ. Press. Oakeshott, Michael. [1947] 1975. “ Leviathan: A Myth.  ” In Hobbes on Civil Association, 159–63. Indianapolis : Liberty. Oakeshott, Michael. [1947] 1993. “Scientific Politics.  ” In Religion, Politics and the Moral Life, ed. TimothyFuller, 97–110. New Haven : Yale Univ. Press. Oakeshott, Michael. [1959] 1991. “The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind.  ” In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, 488–541. Indianapolis : Liberty. Oakeshott, Michael. 1975. On Human Conduct. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press. Oakeshott, Michael. 1991. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis : Liberty.