ZYGO Zygon® 0591-2385 1467-9744 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.01032.x THE BEAUTIFUL AND THE SUBLIME IN NATURAL SCIENCE Walhout Peter K. 02 12 2009 44 4 10.1111/zygo.2009.44.issue-4 757 776 © 2009 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon

The various aesthetic phenomena found repeatedly in the scientific enterprise stem from the role of God as artist. If the Creator is an artist, how and why natural scientists study the divine art work can be understood using theological aesthetics and the philosophy of art. The aesthetic phenomena considered here are as follows. First, science reveals beauty and the sublime in natural phenomena. Second, science discovers beauty and the sublime in the theories that are developed to explain natural phenomena. Third, the search for beauty often guides scientists in their work. Fourth, where beauty is perceived, feelings of the sublime often also follow upon further contemplation. This linkage of beauty in science with truth and the sublime runs counter to most aesthetic theory since Kant. Scholarship in theological aesthetics has recently argued that the modern and postmodern elevation of the sublime over beauty is merely a preference that reveals a bias against transcendence—against God. If doing and understanding science can show this sundering of the sublime from the beautiful to be in error, science also gives evidence of transcendence.

 aesthetics in science art in science art work beautiful beauty beauty in science general revelation God as artist mimesis natural science philosophy of science sublime sublime in science scientist as artist theological aesthetics transcendence wonder work of art Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vol. 2. Ed. JonathanBarnes. Princeton : Princeton Univ. Press. Beardsley, Monroe C.1966. Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present: A Short History. New York : Macmillan. Betz, John R.2005. “Beyond the Sublime: The Aesthetics of the Analogy of Being (Part One).Modern Theology  21:367–411. Betz, John R.2006. “Beyond the Sublime: The Aesthetics of the Analogy of Being (Part Two).Modern Theology  22:1–50. Campbell, Norman Robert. 1957. Foundations of Science  . New York : Dover. Chandrasekhar, S. 1987. Truth and Beauty: Aesthetics and Motivations in Science. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press. Cyprian. 1958. Treatises. Ed. Roy J.Deferrari. New York : Fathers of the Church. Danto, Arthur. 1997. After the End of Art. Princeton : Princeton Univ. Press. Danto, Arthur. 2003. The Abuse of Beauty. Chicago and LaSalle , Ill. : Open Court. Dawkins, Richard. 1998. Unweaving the Rainbow: Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder. London : Faber and Faber. Deane‐Drummond, Celia. 2006. Wonder and Wisdom. Philadelphia : Templeton Foundation Press. Dirac, Paul. 1963. “The Evolution of the Physicist's Picture of Nature.Scientific American  208 (May): 45–53. Einstein, Albert. 1930. “What I Believe.Forum and Century  84:193–94. Engler, Gideon. 1990. “Aesthetics in Science and in Art.British Journal of Aesthetics  30:24–34. Ferguson, Kitty. 1994. Fire in the Equations: Science, Religion, and the Search for God. Grand Rapids , Mich. : Eerdmans. Hart, David Bentley. 2003. The Beauty of the Infinite. Grand Rapids , Mich. : Eerdmans. Heisenberg, Werner. 1974. Across the Frontiers. Trans. PeterHeath. New York : Harper and Row. Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Werner S.Pluhar. Indianapolis : Hackett. Kivy, Peter. 1991. “Science and Aesthetic Appreciation.Midwest Studies in Philosophy  XVI: 180–95. Kroto, Harold. 2003. “Nobel Lecture.  ” In Nobel lectures, Chemistry 1996–2000, ed. IngmarGrenthe. Singapore : World Scientific Publishing. http://nobelprize.org/chemistry/laureates/1996. Kuipers, Theo A. F.2002. “Beauty, a Road to the Truth.Synthese  131:291–328. Marcus, Rudolph. 1993. “Banquet Speech.  ” In Les Prix Nobel:. The Nobel Prizes 1992, Ed. ToreFrängsmyr. Stockholm : Nobel Foundation. http://nobelprize.org/chemistry/laureates/1992. McAllister, James W1996. Beauty and Revolution in Science. Ithaca , N.Y. : Cornell Univ. Press. Milbank, John. 1998. “Sublimity: The Modern Transcendent.  ” In Religion, Modernity, and Postmodernity, Ed. PaulHeelas, 258–84. Oxford : Blackwell. Miller, Jerome. 1992. In the Throe of Wonder: Intimations of the Sacred in a Post‐modern World. Albany : SUNY Press. Nehamas, Alexander. 2007. Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art. Princeton : Princeton Univ. Press. Pinker, Steven. 1999. How the Mind Works. New York : W. W. Norton. Polkinghorne, John. 1995. Serious Talk: Science and Religion in Dialogue. Valley Forge , Pa. : Trinity. Smalley, Richard. 2003. “Nobel Lecture.  ” In Nobel Lectures, Chemistry 1996–2000, Ed. IngmarGrenthe. Singapore : World Scientific Publishing. http://nobelprize.org/chemistry/laureates/1996. Steiner, Wendy. 2001. Venus in Exile: The Rejection of Beauty in Twentieth‐century Art. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press. Wechsler, Judith, ed. 1978. On Aesthetics in Science. Cambridge : MIT Press. Weinberg, Steven. 1992. Dreams of a Final Theory. New York : Pantheon. Wigner, Eugene. 1960. “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences.  ” In Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 13, 1–14. New York : Wiley and Sons. Wilde, Oscar. [1889] 1965. “The Priority of Art.  ” In The Modern Tradition: Backgrounds of Modern Literature, Ed. R.Ellmann and C.Feidelson, 17–23. New York : Oxford Univ. Press. Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1980a. Art in Action: Toward a Christian Aesthetic. Grand Rapids , Mich. : Eerdmans. Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1980b. Works and Worlds of Art. Oxford : Clarendon.