<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01083.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGIC TO SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Palmer</surname>
                  <given-names>Craig T.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Steadman</surname>
                  <given-names>Lyle B.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Cassidy</surname>
                  <given-names>Chris</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Coe</surname>
                  <given-names>Kathryn</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <aff id="a2"/>
         <aff id="a3"/>
         <aff id="a4"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2010-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>2010</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>45</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2010.45.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>317</fpage>
         <lpage>337</lpage>
         <permissions>
            <copyright-statement>© 2010 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon</copyright-statement>
         </permissions>
         <abstract>
            <p>Many anthropological explanations of magical practices are based on the assumption that the immediate cause of performing an act of magic is the belief that the magic will work as claimed. Such explanations typically attempt to show why people come to believe that magical acts work as claimed when such acts do not identifiably have such effects. We suggest an alternative approach to the explanation of magic that views magic as a form of religious behavior, a form of communication that promotes or protects cooperative social relationships. We suggest that all forms of religious behavior involve persons communicating acceptance of a supernatural claim and that this act communicates a willingness to accept nonskeptically the influence of the person making such a claim. Thus, religious behavior communicates a willingness to cooperate with the claim maker and others who accept his or her influence. We suggest that magic, which can be distinguished by the communicated acceptance of the claim that certain techniques have supernatural effects, also promotes cooperation. Different types of magic, including sorcery, love magic, and curing magic, can be shown to communicate different types of messages, such as a threat to use violence to punish unsocial behavior, sexual desire, or concern for a person's well‐being. Ethnographic examples are used to support this hypothesis. This approach requires no assumptions about whether the practitioners of magic do or do not believe that the magical acts work as claimed. It attempts only to account for the identifiable talk and behavior that constitute magical acts by examining the identifiable, and often important, effects of these acts on the behavior of others.</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>belief</kwd>
            <kwd>communication</kwd>
            <kwd>cooperation</kwd>
            <kwd>magic</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Andersen, Raoul. 1972. <source>“Hunt and Deceive: Information Management in Newfoundland Deep‐Sea Trawler Fishing.” 
        </source>
					In
					North Atlantic Fishermen, ed. 
RaoulAndersen and 
CatoWadel, 120–40. 
            St. John's
          : Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Atran, Scott. 2002. In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="book">Bell, Catherine M.2002. <source>“‘The Chinese believe in spirits’: Belief and believing in the study of religion.” 
        </source>
					In
					Radical Interpretation in Religion, ed. 
Nancy K.Frankenberry, 100–116. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="journal">Berryman, Edward. 2005. “Belief, apparitions, and rationality: The social scientific study of religion after Wittgenstein.”<source>Human Studies 
        </source>28:15–39.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Bloch, Maurice. 1996. How We Think They Think: Anthropological Approaches to Cognition, Memory, and Literacy. 
            Boulder
            , 
            Colo.
          : Westview.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Bloch, Maurice. 2002. <source>“Are religious beliefs counter‐intuitive?” 
        </source>
					In
					Radical Interpretation in Religion, ed. 
Nancy K.Frankenberry, 129–46. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Boyer, Pascal. 1994. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas. 
            Berkeley
          : Univ. of California Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="book">Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. 
            New York
          : Basic Books.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Braarvig, Jens. 1999. <source>“Magic: Reconsidering the grand dichotomy.” 
        </source>
					In
					The World of Ancient Magic: Papers from the First International Samson Eitern Seminar at the Norwegian Institute at Athens, 4–8 May 1997, ed. 
David R.Jordan, 
HugoMontgomery, and 
EinarThomassen, 21–54. 
            Bergen
            , 
            Norway
          : Norwegian Institute.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Burkert, Walter. 1996. Creation of the Sacred: Tracks of Biology in Early Religions. 
            Cambridge
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="journal">Cannon, Walter B.1942. “‘Voodoo’ death.”<source>American Anthropologist 
        </source>44:169–81.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="journal">Cronk, Lee. 1994. “Evolutionary Theories of Morality and the Manipulative Use of Signals.”<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>29:81–101.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Davidson, Donald. 1999. <source>“The myth of the subjective.” 
        </source>
					In
					Language, Truth, and Religious Belief: Studies in Twentieth‐Century Theory and Method in Religion, ed. 
Nancy K.Frankenberry and 
Hans H.Penner, 296–310. 
            Atlanta
            , 
            Ga.
          : Scholars.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Elkin, Adolphus Peter. 1964. The Australian Aborigines. 
            Garden City
            , 
            N.Y.
          : Doubleday.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">Evans‐Pritchard, Edward Evan. 1937. Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande. 
            Oxford
          : Clarendon.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="book">Evans‐Pritchard, Edward Evan. 1965. Theories of Primitive Religion. 
            Oxford
          : Clarendon.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Flood, Gavin. 1999. Beyond Phenomenology: Rethinking the Study of Religion. 
            London
          : Cassell.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="journal">Foster, Kevin R., and 
HannaKokko. 2009. “The evolution of superstitious and superstitionlike behaviour.”<source>Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 
        </source>276:31–37.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="book">Frank, Robert H.1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of Emotions. 
            New York
          : W. W. Norton.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="book">Frankenberry, Nancy. 1987. Religion and Radical Empiricism. 
            Albany
          : State Univ. of New York Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b21">
            <mixed-citation id="cit21" publication-type="book">Frankenberry, Nancy. 2002. <source>“Religion as a ‘mobile army of metaphors.’” 
        </source>
					In
					Radical Interpretation in Religion, ed. 
Nancy K.Frankenberry, 171–87. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b22">
            <mixed-citation id="cit22" publication-type="book">Frazer, James. 1951. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. 
            New York
          : Macmillan.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b23">
            <mixed-citation id="cit23" publication-type="book">Godlove, Terry F.Jr.2002. <source>“Saving belief: On the new materialism in religious studies.” 
        </source>
					In
					Radical Interpretation in Religion, ed. 
Nancy K.Frankenberry, 10–24. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b24">
            <mixed-citation id="cit24" publication-type="book">Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. 
            Garden City
            , 
            N.Y.
          : Doubleday.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b25">
            <mixed-citation id="cit25" publication-type="book">Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Trans. and intro. 
ThomasMcCarthy. 
            Boston
          : Beacon.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b26">
            <mixed-citation id="cit26" publication-type="journal">Hahn, Robert A.1973. “Understanding beliefs: An essay on the methodology of the statement and analysis of belief systems.”<source>Current Anthropology 
        </source>14:207–29.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b27">
            <mixed-citation id="cit27" publication-type="book">Haviland, William A.1983. Cultural Anthropology. 
            New York
          : CBS College Publishing.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b28">
            <mixed-citation id="cit28" publication-type="journal">Hilty, Donald M.1988. “Religious belief, participation and consequences: An exploratory and confirmatory analysis.”<source>Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 
        </source>27:243–59.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b29">
            <mixed-citation id="cit29" publication-type="book">Hinde, Robert A.1999. Why Gods Persist: A Scientific Approach to Religion. 
            London
          
					and
					
            New York
          : Routledge.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b30">
            <mixed-citation id="cit30" publication-type="book">Hogbin, Ian. 1964. Guadalcanal Society. 
            New York
          : Holt, Rinehart &amp; Winston.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b31">
            <mixed-citation id="cit31" publication-type="journal">Hulkrantz, Ake. 1983. “The concept of the supernatural in primal religion.”<source>History of Religions 
        </source>22 (3): 231–53.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b32">
            <mixed-citation id="cit32" publication-type="book">Humphrey, Caroline, and 
JamesLaidlaw. 1994. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual: A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b33">
            <mixed-citation id="cit33" publication-type="book">Hunter, David E., and 
PhillipWhitten. 1976. Encyclopedia of Anthropology. 
            New York
          : Harper and Row.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b34">
            <mixed-citation id="cit34" publication-type="book">Irons, William. 2001. <source>“Religion as a hard‐to‐fake sign of commitment.” 
        </source>
					In
					Evolution and the Capacity for Commitment, ed. 
R. M.Neese, 292–309. 
            New York
          : Russell Sage Foundation.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b35">
            <mixed-citation id="cit35" publication-type="book">Jakobson, Roman. 1960. <source>“Concluding Statement: Linguistics and Poetics.” 
        </source>
					In
					Style in Language, ed. 
Thomas A.Sebeok, 350–77. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b36">
            <mixed-citation id="cit36" publication-type="book">James, William. 1979. The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. 
            Cambridge
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b37">
            <mixed-citation id="cit37" publication-type="book">Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2003. The Study of Religion in a New Key: Theoretical and Philosophical Groundings in the Comparative and General Study of Religion. 
            Langelandsgade
            , 
            Denmark
          : Aarhus Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b38">
            <mixed-citation id="cit38" publication-type="journal">Kirsch, Thomas G.2004. “Restaging the will to believe: Religious pluralism, anti‐syncretism, and the problem of belief.”<source>American Anthropologist 
        </source>106:699–709.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b39">
            <mixed-citation id="cit39" publication-type="book">Klemke, E. D.1999. <source>“Are religious statements meaningful?” 
        </source>
					In
					Language, Truth, and Religious Belief: Studies in Twentieth‐Century Theory and Method in Religion, ed. 
Nancy K.Frankenberry and 
Hans H.Penner, 57–75. 
            Atlanta
            , 
            Ga.
          : Scholars.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b40">
            <mixed-citation id="cit40" publication-type="book">Kluckhohn, Clyde. [1942] 1972. <source>“Myths &amp; rituals: A general theory.” 
        </source>
					In
					Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological Approach, 3d ed., ed. 
W.Lessa and 
E.Vogt, 66–77. 
            New York
          : Harper and Row.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b41">
            <mixed-citation id="cit41" publication-type="book">Kluckhohn, Clyde, and 
DorotheaLeighton. 1962. The Navajo. 
            Garden City
            , 
            N.Y.
          : Anchor Books, Doubleday.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b42">
            <mixed-citation id="cit42" publication-type="book">Kottak, Conrad. 1974. Cultural Anthropology. 
            New York
          : Random House.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b43">
            <mixed-citation id="cit43" publication-type="journal">Laurier, Eric. 2004. “The spectacular showing: Houdini and the wonder of ethnomethodology.”<source>Human Studies 
        </source>27:377–99.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b44">
            <mixed-citation id="cit44" publication-type="book">Lavenda, Robert, and 
EmilySchultz. 2003. Core Concepts in Cultural Anthropology. 
            Boston
          : McGraw‐Hill.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b45">
            <mixed-citation id="cit45" publication-type="journal">Lawson, Thomas E., and 
Robert N.McCauley1984. “Functionalism Reconsidered.”<source>History of Religions 
        </source>23:372–81.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b46">
            <mixed-citation id="cit46" publication-type="book">Lawson, Thomas E.1990. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b47">
            <mixed-citation id="cit47" publication-type="book">Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1931. <source>“Culture.” 
        </source>
					In
					Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. IV, ed. 
E.Seligman and 
A.Johnson, 634–42. 
            New York
          : Macmillan.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b48">
            <mixed-citation id="cit48" publication-type="book">Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1979. <source>“The role of magic and religion.” 
        </source>
					In
					Reader in Comparative Religion: An anthropological Approach, 4th ed., ed. 
W.Lessa and 
E.Vogt, 37–46. 
            New York
          : Harper and Row.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b49">
            <mixed-citation id="cit49" publication-type="journal">Nadel, Siegfried. 1977. “Magic thinking.”<source>Canberra Anthropology 
        </source>1:1–14.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b50">
            <mixed-citation id="cit50" publication-type="book">Needham, Rodney. 1972. Belief, Language, and Experience. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b51">
            <mixed-citation id="cit51" publication-type="journal">Palmer, Craig T.1989. “The ritual taboos of fishermen: An alternative explanation.”<source>Maritime Anthropological Studies 
        </source>2:59–68.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b52">
            <mixed-citation id="cit52" publication-type="journal">Palmer, Craig T.1990. “Telling the Truth (Up to a Point): Radio Communication among Maine Lobstermen.”<source>Human Organization 
        </source>49 (2): 157–63.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b53">
            <mixed-citation id="cit53" publication-type="journal">Palmer, Craig T.1991. “Kin‐Selection, Reciprocal Altruism and Information Sharing among Maine Lobstermen.”<source>Ethology and Sociobiology 
        </source>12 (3): 221–36.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b54">
            <mixed-citation id="cit54" publication-type="journal">Palmer, Craig T., and 
Lyle B.Steadman. 2004. “With or without belief: A new approach to the definition and explanation of religion.”<source>Evolution and Cognition 
        </source>10:138–47.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b55">
            <mixed-citation id="cit55" publication-type="journal">Palmer, Craig T., 
Lyle B.Steadman, and 
ChrisCassidy2006. “Traditional religious ritual sacrifice: Cultural materialism, costly signaling, or descendant‐leaving strategy?”<source>Journal of Ritual Studies 
        </source>20:33–42.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b56">
            <mixed-citation id="cit56" publication-type="book">Penner, Hans H.1999. <source>“What's wrong with functional explanations?” 
        </source>
					In
					Language, Truth, and Religious Belief: Studies in Twentieth‐Century Theory and Method in Religion, ed. 
Nancy K.Frankenberry and 
Hans H.Penner, 246–72. Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b57">
            <mixed-citation id="cit57" publication-type="book">Penner, Hans H.2002. <source>“You don't read a myth for information.” 
        </source>
					In
					Radical Interpretation in Religion, ed. 
Nancy K.Frankenberry, 153–70. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b58">
            <mixed-citation id="cit58" publication-type="book">Peoples, James, and 
GarrickBailey2000. Humanity, an Introduction to Cultural Anthropology. 
            Belmont
            , 
            Calif.
          : Wadsworth.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b59">
            <mixed-citation id="cit59" publication-type="book">Proudfoot, Wayne L.2002. <source>“Religious belief and naturalism.” 
        </source>
					In
					Radical Interpretation in Religion, ed. 
Nancy K.Frankenberry, 78–92. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b60">
            <mixed-citation id="cit60" publication-type="book">Rappaport, Roy. 1979. <source>“Ritual, sanctity, and cybernetics.” 
        </source>
					In
					Reader in Comparative Religion, 4th ed., ed. 
W. A.Lessa and 
E. Z.Vogt, 254–66. 
            New York
          : HarperCollins.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b61">
            <mixed-citation id="cit61" publication-type="book">Romberg, Raquel. 2003. Witchcraft and Welfare: Spiritual Capital and the Business of Magic in Modern Puerto Rico. 
            Austin
          : Univ. of Texas Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b62">
            <mixed-citation id="cit62" publication-type="book">Rozin, Paul, and 
CarolNemeroff1990. <source>“The laws of sympathetic magic: A psychological analysis of similarity and contagion.” 
        </source>
					In
					Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development, ed. 
James W.Stigler, 
Richard A.Shweder, and 
GilbertHerdt, 205–32. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b63">
            <mixed-citation id="cit63" publication-type="journal">Saler, Benson. 1974. “Review of <italic>Belief, Language, and Experience by R. Needham</italic>”<source>American Anthropologist 
        </source>76:861–66.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b64">
            <mixed-citation id="cit64" publication-type="book">Smith, Pierre. 1982. <source>“Aspects of the Organisation of Rites.” 
        </source>
					In
					Between Belief and Transgression: Structuralist Essays in Religion, History and Myth, ed. 
MichaelIzard and 
PierreSmith, trans. 
JohnLeavitt, 103–28. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b65">
            <mixed-citation id="cit65" publication-type="journal">Sosis, Richard. 2000. “Religion and intragroup cooperation: Preliminary results of a comparative analysis of utopian communities.”<source>Cross-Cultural Research 
        </source>34:71–88.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b66">
            <mixed-citation id="cit66" publication-type="journal">Sosis, Richard. 2003a. “Cooperation and Commune Longevity: A Test of Costly Signaling Theory of Religion.”<source>Cross Cultural Research 
        </source>37:211–39.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b67">
            <mixed-citation id="cit67" publication-type="journal">Sosis, Richard. 2003b. “Why Aren't We All Hutterites? Costly Signaling Theory and Religious Behavior.”<source>Human Nature 
        </source>14:91–127.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b68">
            <mixed-citation id="cit68" publication-type="journal">Sosis, Richard. 2004. “The Adaptive Value of Religious Ritual.”<source>American Scientist 
        </source>92:166–72.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b69">
            <mixed-citation id="cit69" publication-type="journal">Sosis, Richard, and 
CandaceAlcorta2003. “Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behaviour.”<source>Evolutionary Anthropology 
        </source>12:264–70.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b70">
            <mixed-citation id="cit70" publication-type="journal">Sosis, Richard, and 
Bradley J.Ruffle. 2004. “Reply.”<source>Current Anthropology 
        </source>45:530–31.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b71">
            <mixed-citation id="cit71" publication-type="book">Sperber, Dan. 1982. <source>“Apparently Irrational Beliefs.” 
        </source>
					In
					Rationality and Relativism, ed. 
MartinHollis and 
StevenLukes, 149–80. 
            Oxford
          : Blackwell.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b72">
            <mixed-citation id="cit72" publication-type="journal">Steadman, Lyle B.1975. “Cannibal witches among the Hewa.”<source>Oceania 
        </source>12:114–21.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b73">
            <mixed-citation id="cit73" publication-type="journal">Steadman, Lyle B.1985. “The killing of witches.”<source>Oceania 
        </source>56:106–23.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b74">
            <mixed-citation id="cit74" publication-type="journal">Steadman, Lyle B., and 
Craig T.Palmer. 1995. “Religion as an identifiable traditional behavior subject to natural selection.”<source>Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 
        </source>18 (2): 149–64.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b75">
            <mixed-citation id="cit75" publication-type="book">Steadman, Lyle B., and 
Craig T.Palmer. 2008. The Supernatural and Natural Selection: The Evolution of Religion. 
            Boulder
            , 
            Colo.
          : Paradigm.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b76">
            <mixed-citation id="cit76" publication-type="book">Styers, Randall. 2004. Making Magic: Religion, magic, and science in the modern world. 
            New York
          : Oxford Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b77">
            <mixed-citation id="cit77" publication-type="book">Tambiah, Stanley Jeyaraja. 1985. Culture, Thought, and Social Action: An Anthropological Perspective. 
            Cambridge
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b78">
            <mixed-citation id="cit78" publication-type="book">Tambiah, Stanley Jeyaraja. 1990. Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b79">
            <mixed-citation id="cit79" publication-type="journal">Thomas, Keith. 1975. “An anthropology of religion and magic, II.”<source>Journal of Interdisciplinary History 
        </source>6:91–109.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b80">
            <mixed-citation id="cit80" publication-type="book">Thomassen, Einar. 1999. <source>“Is magic a subclass of ritual?” 
        </source>
					In
					The World of Ancient Magic: Papers from the First International Samson Eitern Seminar at the Norwegian Institute at Athens, 4–8 May 1997, ed. 
David R.Jordan, 
HugoMontgomery, and 
EinarThomassen, 55–66. 
            Bergen
            , 
            Norway
          : Norwegian Institute.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b81">
            <mixed-citation id="cit81" publication-type="book">Thornhill, Randy, and 
Craig T.Palmer. 2000. A Natural History of Rape: The Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion. 
            Cambridge
          : MIT Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b82">
            <mixed-citation id="cit82" publication-type="journal">Thourangeau, Roger, and 
RobertSternberg1981. “Aptness in metaphor.”<source>Cognitive Psychology 
        </source>13:27–55.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b83">
            <mixed-citation id="cit83" publication-type="book">WarnerW. Lloyd. [1937] 1964. Black Civilization: A Study of an Australian Tribe. 
            New York
          : Harper and Row.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b84">
            <mixed-citation id="cit84" publication-type="journal">Watanabe, John M., and 
Barbara B.Smuts. 1999. “Explaining Religion without Explaining It Away: Trust, Truth, and the Evolution of Cooperation.” in The Obvious Aspects of Ritual. Ecologies for Tomorrow: Reading Rappaport Today. Contemporary Issues Forum, ed. 
AlettaBiersack<source>American Anthropologist 
        </source>101:98–112.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b85">
            <mixed-citation id="cit85" publication-type="journal">Wells, Wesley R.1921. “Is supernatural belief essential in a definition of religion?”<source>The Journal of Philosophy 
        </source>18:269–74.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b86">
            <mixed-citation id="cit86" publication-type="book">Wilson, David Sloan. 2002. Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. 
            Chicago
          : Univ. of Chicago Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b87">
            <mixed-citation id="cit87" publication-type="book">Winch, Peter. 1999. <source>“Understanding a Primitive Society.” 
        </source>
					In
					Language, Truth, and Religious Belief: Studies in Twentieth‐Century Theory and Method in Religion, ed. 
Nancy K.Frankenberry and 
Hans H.Penner, 342–77. 
            Atlanta
            , 
            Ga.
          : Scholars.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b88">
            <mixed-citation id="cit88" publication-type="book">Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1966. Lectures and Conversation on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief. ed. 
C. K.Barrett. 
            Berkeley
          : Univ. of California Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
