ZYGO Zygon® 0591-2385 1467-9744 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01095.x THE GENETIC RECOMBINATION OF SCIENCE AND RELIGION Modell Stephen M. 02 06 2010 45 2 10.1111/zygo.2010.45.issue-2 462 468 © 2010 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon

The estrangement between genetic scientists and theologians originating in the 1960s is reflected in novel combinations of human thought (subject) and genes (investigational object), paralleling each other through the universal process known in chaos theory as self‐similarity. The clash and recombination of genes and knowledge captures what Philip Hefner refers to as irony, one of four voices he suggests transmit the knowledge and arguments of the religion‐and‐science debate. When viewed along a tangent connecting irony to leadership, journal dissemination, and the activities of the “public intellectual” and the public at large, the sequence of voices is shown to resemble the passage of genetic information from DNA to mRNA, tRNA, and protein, and from cell nucleus to surrounding environment. In this light, Hefner's inquiry into the voices of Zygon is bound up with the very subject matter Zygon covers.

 cell chaos DNA genetics irony journal leadership meiosis mitosis policy making protein public recombination religion RNA science self‐similarity systems theory Barbour, Ian G.1990. Religion in an Age of Science. London : SCM Press. Collins, Francis S.2007. The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief. New York : The Free Press. Communities of Color and Genetics Policy Project (CCGPP).2002. Policy Reports and Recommendations, October, 2001. Ann Arbor , Mich. : CCGPP. http://www.sph.umich.edu/genpolicy/current/reports/index.html. Dunston, Georgia M.2000. “The Implications of Human Genome Research for Minority Health Issues.”  http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/zetaphibeta/dunston.shtml. Eaves, Lindon. 1989. “Spirit, Method, and Content in Science and Religion: The Theological Perspective of a Geneticist.”Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  24:185–215. Eliade, Mircea. 1959. Cosmos and History: The Myth of the Eternal Return. New York : Harper and Row; The Bollingen Library. Garland, Michael J.1999. “Experts and the Public: A Needed Partnership for Genetic Policy.”Public Understanding of Science  8:241–54. Gleick, James. 1988. Chaos: Making a New Science. New York : Penguin. Hefner, Philip. 1989. “The Role of Science in Pannenberg's Theological Thinking.”Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  24:135–51. Hefner, Philip. 2000. The Human Factor: Evolution, Culture, and Religion. Minneapolis : Augsburg Fortress. Hefner, Philip. 2003. Technology and Human Becoming. Minneapolis : Augsburg Fortress. Hefner, Philip. 2010. “Discerning the Voice of Zygon: Identity and Issues.”Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  45:419–29. Institute of Medicine (IOM).2003. The Future of the Public's Health in the 21st Century. Washington , D.C. : National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine (IOM).2006. Genes, Behavior, and the Social Environment. Washington , D.C. : National Academies Press. Martin, Richard M.1982. “On Logical Structure and the Plotinic Cosmos.”  In The Structure of Being: A Neoplatonic Approach, ed. R.Baine Harris, 11–23. Albany : State Univ. of New York Press. Modell, Stephen. 1992. Science and Society: Selected Issues. Ann Arbor : Univ. of Michigan Genome Ethics Committee. Modell, Stephen. 2007. “Genetic and Reproductive Technologies in the Light of Religious Dialogue.”Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  42:163–82. Nelkin, Dorothy, and M.Susan Lindee. 2004. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. Ann Arbor : Univ. of Michigan Press. Payne, Perry W.Jr., CharmaineRoyal, and Sharon L. R.Kardia. 2007. “Genetic and Social Environment Interactions and Their Impact on Health Policy.”Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons  15 suppl (September): S95–S98. Sacks, Kenneth S.2008. Emerson: Political Writings. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.