<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01122.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>SEMIOTICS AS A METAPHYSICAL FRAMEWORK FOR CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Robinson</surname>
                  <given-names>Andrew</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Southgate</surname>
                  <given-names>Christopher</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2010-09-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>09</month>
            <year>2010</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>45</volume>
         <issue>3</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.2010.45.issue-3</issue-id>
         <fpage>689</fpage>
         <lpage>712</lpage>
         <permissions>
            <copyright-statement>© 2010 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon</copyright-statement>
         </permissions>
         <abstract>
            <p>We provide an overview of a proposal for a new metaphysical framework within which theology and science might both find a home. Our proposal draws on the triadic semiotics and threefold system of metaphysical categories of C. S. Peirce. We summarize the key features of a semiotic model of the Trinity, based on observed parallels between Peirce's categories of Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness and Christian thinking about, respectively, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. We test and extend the semiotic model by exploring how Peirce's taxonomy of signs offers a new approach to theological reflection on the Incarnation. This leads to a novel way of framing scientific questions about human evolution in semiotic terms and to a new approach to theological anthropology. Finally, we use the semiotic model of the Trinity as the basis of a trinitarian approach to the theology of creation according to which the semiotic processes that are fundamental to life and to human behavior and cognition may be understood as “vestiges of the Trinity in creation.”</p>
         </abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <kwd>anthropology</kwd>
            <kwd>evolution</kwd>
            <kwd>incarnation</kwd>
            <kwd>C. S. Peirce</kwd>
            <kwd>semiotics</kwd>
            <kwd>Trinity</kwd>
            <kwd>vestiges of the Trinity</kwd>
         </kwd-group>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="b1">
            <mixed-citation id="cit1" publication-type="book">Augustine. 1991. <source>The Trinity. Trans. E. Hill. 
        </source>
					In
					The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century, ed. 
J. E.Rotelle. 
            New York
          : New City Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b2">
            <mixed-citation id="cit2" publication-type="book">Baillie, D. M.1948. God Was in Christ: An Essay on Incarnation and Atonement. 
            London
          : Faber and Faber.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b3">
            <mixed-citation id="cit3" publication-type="journal">Balter, Michael. 2002. “From a Modern Humans Brow—or Doodling?<source>Science 
        </source>295:247–49.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b4">
            <mixed-citation id="cit4" publication-type="book">Deacon, Terrence. 1997. The Symbolic Species. 
            Harmondsworth
            , 
            U.K.
          : Penguin.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b5">
            <mixed-citation id="cit5" publication-type="book">Ford, David F.1999. Self and Salvation: Being Transformed. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b6">
            <mixed-citation id="cit6" publication-type="book">Greene, Colin J. D.2003. Christology in Cultural Perspective: Marking Out the Horizons. 
            Grand Rapids
            , 
            Mich., and Cambridge, U.K.
          : William B. Eerdmans.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b7">
            <mixed-citation id="cit7" publication-type="book">Gunton, Colin E.1998. The Triune Creator: A Historical and Systematic Study. 
            Edinburgh
          : Edinburgh Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b8">
            <mixed-citation id="cit8" publication-type="journal">Harris, Harriet A.1998. “Should We Say that Personhood Is Relational?<source>Scottish Journal of Theology 
        </source>51:214–34.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b9">
            <mixed-citation id="cit9" publication-type="book">Irenaeus. 1867. The Writings of Irenaeus, Volume 1. Trans. 
AlexanderRoberts and 
W. H.Rambaut. 
            Edinburgh
          : T &amp; T Clark.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b10">
            <mixed-citation id="cit10" publication-type="book">Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “<source>Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes 
        </source>.”
					In
					Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965, volume 4, ed. 
I.Lakatos and 
A.Musgrave, 91–196. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b11">
            <mixed-citation id="cit11" publication-type="book">Louth, Andrew. 2008. “<source>The Place of <italic>Theosis</italic> in Orthodox Theology 
        </source>.”
					In
					Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions, ed. 
M. J.Christensen and 
J. A.Wittung, 32–44. 
            Grand Rapids
            , 
            Mich.
          : Baker Academic.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b12">
            <mixed-citation id="cit12" publication-type="book">Mithen, Steven. 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science. 
            London
          : Thames and Hudson.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b13">
            <mixed-citation id="cit13" publication-type="book">Murphy, Nancey1990. Theology in an Age of Scientific Reasoning. 
            New York
          : Cornell Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b14">
            <mixed-citation id="cit14" publication-type="book">Noble, William, and 
IainDavidson. 1996. Human Evolution, Language and Mind: A Psychological and Archaeological Enquiry. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b15">
            <mixed-citation id="cit15" publication-type="book">O'Collins, Gerald. 1999. The Tripersonal God: Understanding and Interpreting the Trinity. 
            London
          : Geoffrey Chapman.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b16">
            <mixed-citation id="cit16" publication-type="book">Pannenberg, Wolfhart. 1994. Systematic Theology, Volume 2. Trans.
					G. W.Bromiley. 
            Grand Rapids
            , 
            Mich.
          : William B. Eerdmans.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b17">
            <mixed-citation id="cit17" publication-type="book">Peirce, Charles S.19311935. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. I–VI, ed. 
CharlesHartshorne and 
PaulWeiss. 
            Cambridge
          : Harvard Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b18">
            <mixed-citation id="cit18" publication-type="book">Peirce, Charles S.1992. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 1 (1867–1893). 
            Bloomington
          : Indiana Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b19">
            <mixed-citation id="cit19" publication-type="journal">Prestige, G. L.1933. “Agen[n]etos and Cognate Words in Athanasius. 
<source>The Journal of Theological Studies 
        </source>34:258–65.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b20">
            <mixed-citation id="cit20" publication-type="book">Rahner, Karl. [1941] 1969. Hearers of the Word. Trans.
					R.Walls. Rev. ed.
					
            London and Sydney
          : Sheed and Ward.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b21">
            <mixed-citation id="cit21" publication-type="book">Raposa, Michael L.1989. Peirce's Philosophy of Religion. 
            Bloomington
          : Indiana Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b22">
            <mixed-citation id="cit22" publication-type="other">Robinson, Andrew J.2003. <source>A Semiotic Model of the Trinity: God, Evolution and the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce 
        </source>. Ph.D. diss., Theology, University of Exeter, Exeter.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b23">
            <mixed-citation id="cit23" publication-type="journal">Robinson, Andrew J.2004. “Continuity, Naturalism, and Contingency: A Theology of Evolution Drawing on the Semiotics of C. S. Peirce and Trinitarian Thought. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>39:111–36.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b24">
            <mixed-citation id="cit24" publication-type="book">Robinson, Andrew J.
					In press. God and the World of Signs: Trinity, Evolution and the Metaphysical Semiotics of C. S. Peirce. 
            Leiden
          : Brill.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b25">
            <mixed-citation id="cit25" publication-type="journal">Robinson, Andrew, and 
ChristopherSouthgate. 2010a. “Introduction: Toward a Metaphysic of Meaning. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>45:339–44.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b26">
            <mixed-citation id="cit26" publication-type="journal">Robinson, Andrew, and 
ChristopherSouthgate. 2010b. “A General Definition of Interpretation and Its Application to Origin of Life Research. 
<source>Biology and Philosophy 
        </source>25:163–82.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b27">
            <mixed-citation id="cit27" publication-type="journal">Robinson, Andrew, and 
ChristopherSouthgate. In press a. “Incarnation and Semiotics: A Theological and Anthropological Hypothesis. Part 1: Incarnation and Peirce's Taxonomy of Signs. 
<source>Theology and Science 
        </source>8, No. 3
					(August).
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b28">
            <mixed-citation id="cit28" publication-type="journal">Robinson, Andrew, and 
ChristopherSouthgate. In press b. “Incarnation and Semiotics: A Theological and Anthropological Hypothesis. Part 2: Semiotics, Anthropology, and Religious Transformation. 
<source>Theology and Science 
        </source>8, No. 3
					(August).
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b29">
            <mixed-citation id="cit29" publication-type="book">Sandage, Steven J., and 
F. LeRonShults. 2003. The Faces of Forgiveness: Searching for Wholeness and Salvation. 
            Grand Rapids
            , 
            Mich.
          : Baker Academic.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b30">
            <mixed-citation id="cit30" publication-type="book">Short, T. L.2004. “<source>The Development of Peirces Theory of Signs 
        </source>.”
					In
					The Cambridge Companion to Peirce, ed. 
C.Misak, 114–240. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b31">
            <mixed-citation id="cit31" publication-type="book">Short, T. L.2007. Peirces Theory of Signs. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge University Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b32">
            <mixed-citation id="cit32" publication-type="journal">Southgate, Christopher, and 
AndrewRobinson. 2010. “Interpretation and the Origin of Life. 
<source>Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 
        </source>45:345–60.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b33">
            <mixed-citation id="cit33" publication-type="book">Tilley, Terrence W.2008. The Disciples' Jesus: Christology as Reconciling Practice. 
            New York
          : Orbis.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b34">
            <mixed-citation id="cit34" publication-type="book">Whitehead, Alfred North. [1926] 1960. Religion in the Making. 
            New York
          : World Publishing.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b35">
            <mixed-citation id="cit35" publication-type="book">Wright, N. T.1996. Jesus and the Victory of God. 
            London
          : SPCK.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="b36">
            <mixed-citation id="cit36" publication-type="book">Wynn, Mark. 2005. Emotional Experience and Religious Understanding: Integrating Perception, Conception and Feeling. 
            Cambridge
          : Cambridge Univ. Press.
</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
</article>
