<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article"
         dtd-version="1.2"
         xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id>ZYGO</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Zygon®</journal-title>
            <abbrev-journal-title/>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn pub-type="print">0591-2385</issn>
         <issn pub-type="electronic">1467-9744</issn>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9744.1973.tb00219.x</article-id>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>A FACT IS A FACT IS A FACT</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name name-style="western">
                  <surname>Wall</surname>
                  <given-names>George B.</given-names>
               </name>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="a1"/>
         <pub-date publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="1973-06-02">
            <day>02</day>
            <month>06</month>
            <year>1973</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>8</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/zygo.1973.8.issue-2</issue-id>
         <fpage>128</fpage>
         <lpage>132</lpage>
         <permissions/>
         <counts/>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body/>
   <back>
      <fn-group>
         <fn id="fn1">
            <label>1</label>
            <p>. Zygon, vol. 4 (March 1969 and September 1969).</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn2">
            <label>2</label>
            <p>. I am assuming that ethical egoism may be stated so that it is not inconsistent. See JohnHospers. 
Baier and Medlin on Ethical Egoism. 
<source>Philosophical Studies 
        </source>12: (1961) 10–16.
Peter H.HareIn Defense of Impersonal Egoism. 
<source>Philosophical Studies 
        </source>17: (1966) 94–95.
RogerDonway. 
Can Egoists Be Consistent?<source>Ethics 
        </source>80: (1969) 50–51.
</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn3">
            <label>3</label>
            <p>. See George B.Wall. 
The Specter of Hume. 
<source>Zygon 
        </source>4: (1969) 272–73.
</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn4">
            <label>4</label>
            <p>. MayLeavenworth. 
On the Impotence of Unnatural Values,” <source>Zygon 
        </source>4 (1969): 284.
</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn5">
            <label>5</label>
            <p>. Stephen C.Pepper. 
On a Descriptive Theory of Value. 
<source>Zygon 
        </source>4: (1969) 263.
</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn6">
            <label>6</label>
            <p>. John Ladd, The Structure of the Moral Code (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967), pp. 277 ff.</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn7">
            <label>7</label>
            <p>. Stephen C.Pepper. 
Survival Value. 
<source>Zygon 
        </source>4 (1969): 11.
</p>
         </fn>
         <fn id="fn8">
            <label>8</label>
            <p>. Leavenworth, p. 285.</p>
         </fn>
      </fn-group>
   </back>
</article>
