Notes

  1. . Robert L. Heilbroner, An Inquiry into the Human Prospect (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., (1974), p. 14.
  2. . Ibid., p. 56.
  3. .NicholasWade, “Robert L. Heilbroner: Portrait of a World without Science,” Science  185 (1974): 598.
  4. . Ibid., p. 599.
  5. . Ibid.
  6. . Heilbroner, p. 57.
  7. . Theodore Rosiak, Where the Wasteland Ends (New York: Anchor Hooks, (1973), chap. 4.
  8. .R. W. H., “Editorial,” Zygon  , 9 (1974): 6.
  9. . Paul Tillich, Dynamics of Faith (New York: Harper & Row, (1958), p. 31.
  10. . As quoted by Wade, p. 598. Heilbroner suggests that science could not he practiced because the curiosity on which it is based would be incompatible with the religious “tradition and ritual” of surviving societies.
  11. . Stephen Toulmin, Human Understanding (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, (1972), 1:492.
  12. .Jay W.Forrester, “Churches at the Transition between Growth and World Equilibrium,” Zygon  7 (1972): 167.
  13. . Jacques Monod, Chance and Necessity, trans. Austryn Wainhouse (New York: Vintage Books, (1972), p. 44.
  14. . Steven Weinberg, “Reflections of a Working Scientist,” Daedalus (Summer (1974), p. 43.
  15. . Ibid.
  16. . Marc J. Roberts, “On the Nature and Condition of Social Science,” Daedalus (Summer (1974), p. 55.
  17. . Toulmin, pp. 487–88.
  18. . R. W. H. (n. 8 above), p. 4.
  19. . Toulmin, p. 478.
  20. . Tillich, p. 97.
  21. . Roszak, p. 336. Among others, such ideas as lawfulness, order, causality, and objectivity serve as science's symbols of faith.
  22. .EdwardShils, “Faith, Utility, and Legitimacy of Science,” Daedalus  (Summer 1974), p. 11.
  23. . Heilbroner speaks of “civilizational malaise” (see Heilbroner, pp 21–23).
  24. . A beautiful phrase of Raymond Aron's in the essay, “Max Weber and Michael Polanyi,” in The Logic of Personal Knowledge: Essays Presented to Michael Polanyi, ed. Marjorie Grene (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, (1961), p. 99.