Notes

  1. . Karl R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, rev. ed. (London: Hutchinson, 1968). P. 15.
  2. . Thomas F. Torrance, Theological Science (London: Oxford University Press, 1969), pp. 121 and 125.
  3. . Hugo, Adam Bedau, “Complementarity and theRelation between Science and Religion,” Zygon  9 (1974): 202–24.
  4. . Ibid., p. 206.
  5. . Ibid., p. 207.
  6. . Ibid.
  7. . Ibid., p. 209.
  8. . Ibid.
  9. . Ibid.
  10. . Ibid., p. 215.
  11. . D. M. MacKay,' 9 (1974): 225.
  12. . Ibid.
  13. . Ibid., p. 226.
  14. . Ibid., p. 225.
  15. . Ibid., p. 227.
  16. . Ibid., p. 229.
  17. . Ibid., p. 230.
  18. . Ibid.
  19. . Ibid., p. 240.
  20. . Ibid.
  21. . Ernst Cassirer, “Einstein's Theory of Relativity,” in his Substance and Function and Einstein's Theory of Relativity (New York: Dover Publication, Inc., 1953), p. 379.
  22. . G. E. Moore, Philosophical Studies (Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams & Co., 1968), p. 288.
  23. . Charles Hartshorne, The Divine Relativity: A Social C0nceptw.n of God (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1964), p. 103.
  24. . RichardSchlegel, “Quantum Physics and Human Purpose,” Zygon  8 (1973): 200.