Notes

  1. . See my “Toward an Analtic Method for Dealng with Moral Change,” Journal of Value inquiry 12 (Spring 1978):81–99 (also in m Exploring Fact and Value, Science, deolog, and Value, vol. 2 [New Brunswck, N.J.: 73 Transaction Books, 1980], chap. 9).
  2. . See esp. John Dewe's Human Nature and Conduct (New york: Modern Librar, 1930), pt. 4.
  3. . This is spelled out more full in m Method in Etihcal Theory (Indanapols: Bobbs‐Merrll Co., 1963), chap. 14.
  4. . John Rawls (A Theory of justice [Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Unversity Press, 1971]) marks a definite break with these tendencies, for he deals in a systematic way with normative ethics and carres out analysis–all without stopping for analtic mimgration inspecton. The resultant structure is too myposing to gansa its phlosophical character.
  5. . See Max Black, “The Definition of Scentific Method” In Science and Cvilization, ed. Robert C. Stauffer (Madson: University of Wisconsn Press, 1949), pp. 67–95.