Notes

  1. . Arthur J. Dyck, “Moral Requiredness: Bridging the Gap Between ‘Ought’ and ‘Is—Part I,” Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (Fall 1978): 293–318. For a fuller discussion see my “Is/Ought: A Risky Relationship between Theology and Science,” in The Sciences and Theology in the 20th Century, ed. A. R. Peacocke (London: Oriel Press, 1981).
  2. . George Edgin Pugh, The Biological Origin of Human Values (New York: Basic Books, 1977).
  3. . See, e.g., Arthur Boughey, Man and the Environment (New York: Macmillan Co., 1971).
  4. . Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976).
  5. . Donald, T. Campbell, “On the Conflicts between Biological and Social Evolution and between Psychology and Moral Tradition,” Zygon  11 (September 1976):167–208; Ralph Wendell, Burhoe,“ The Human Prospect and the Lord of History,” ibid. 10 (September 1975): 299–375.
  6. . Described by Irven DeVore, at the Twenty‐sixth Summer Conference (“Evolution, Human Nature and Values”) of the Institute on Religion in an Age of Science, Star Island, New Hampshire, July 28‐August 4, 1979.
  7. . See my “To What Extent Can Science Replace Metaphysics? Reflecting with Ralph Wendell Burhoe on the ‘Lord of History’,” Zygon 12 (March 1977): 88–104.
  8. . See A.R.Peacocke, “Reductionism: a Review of the Epistemological Issues and Their Relevance to Biology and the Problem of Consciousness,” Zygon  11 (December 1976): 307–34.