Abstract
Abstract. These are reflections on the Arkansas creationist trial by a witness for the American Civil Liberties Union. The following points are stressed: First, religion took the lead in defending science at the trial. Second, the appearance of creation science is a function not only of Protestant fudamentalism but also of the establishment of science in our wider culture. It represents a “deviant science” in such a culture. Third, our century has manifested many such bizarre unions of ideological religion and modern science. This shows that science is dependent upon its humanistic, moral, and religious matrix for its social and historical health. Fourth, part of the cause of the rise of creation science has been the power, status, and self–assurance of science that it represents “the only form of truth.” Fifth, religion in turn tends both to increase and to become fanatical in advanced and precarious cultures; religion, therefore, needs rational and moral criticism if it would help in the creation of social health.
Keywords
proximate versus ultimate origins, dependence of science 011 the humanities, logical limits of science, “popular science”, creation science, establishment of science
How to Cite
Gilkey, L., (1987) “RELIGION AND SCIENCE IN AN ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC CULTURE”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 22(2), 165–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1987.tb00844.x