ON THE “USE” OF NEOPRAGMATISM

Philip Clayton; Philip Clayton

doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01040.x

Abstract

Abstract. The present article continues an earlier critique of Robbins's and Rorty's neopragmatism. Their skepticism about the traditional concept of correspondence and about the criteria for truth are both unjustified, and their own assertion of meaning as usefulness either presupposes a prior notion of linguistic reference or fails to qualify as a sufficient criterion for knowledge. The difficulties with neopragmatism have implications for two other areas of the religion/science discussion, postmodernism and empirical Theology. Postmodernism shares neopragmatism's mistakes regarding the philosophy of language and can be rejected without endangering one's empiricism, humanism, or naturalism. By contrast, the strengths of empirical Theology, and of religious empiricism in general, can be preserved without Robbins's proposed ban on metaphysics.

Keywords

Dewey, Lakatos, postmodernism, realism and reference, neopragmatism, empirical Theology, scientific method, Rorty

How to Cite

Clayton, P., (1993) “ON THE “USE” OF NEOPRAGMATISM”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 28(3), 361–369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01040.x

Rights

Download

References

Boisvert, Raymond D.Dewey's Metaphysics. New York : Fordham Univ. Press.

Clayton, Philip.1989. Explanation from Physics to Theology: An Essay in Rationality and Religion. New Haven : Yale Univ. Press.

Clayton, Philip.1991. Review of Murphy (1990). CTNS Bulletin (Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences) 11:29–31.

Clayton, Philip1992. Response to Robbins, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 27 (December): 457–59.

Dean, William.1986. American Religious Empiricism. Albany : SUNY Press.

Dewey, John.1925. Experience and Nature. Chicago : Open Court.

Dewey, John. [1929] 1984.The Quest for Certainly. In John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 4. Carbondale : Southern Illinois Univ. Press.

Dewey, John. [1934] 1982.Art as Experience. In John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 10. Carbondale : Southern Illinois Univ. Press.

Hefner, Philip.1969. “Towards a New Doctrine of Man: The Relationship of Man and Nature .” In The Future of Empirical Theology, ed. BernardMeland. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.

Lyotard, Jean‐Francois.1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis : Univ. of Minnesota Press.

Murphy, Nancey.1987. “Acceptability Criteria for Work in Theology and ScienceZygon: Journal of Religion and Science 22 (September): 279–97.

Murphy, Nancey.1990. Theology in the Age of Scientific Reasoning. Ithaca : Cornell Univ. Press.

Peters, Karl.1992. “Empirical Theology in the Light of Science. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 27 (September): 297–325.

Robbins, J. Wesley.1992. Review of van Huyssteen and Clayton, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 27 (June): 225–31.

Robbins, J. Wesley.1993. “A Neopragmatist Perspective on Religion and Science. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 28 (September): 337–49.

Rockefeller, Steven C.. 1991. John Dewey: Religious Faith and Democratic Humanism. New York : Colombia Univ. Press.

Rorty, Richard.1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton : Princeton Univ. Press.

Rorty, Richard.1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis : Univ. of Minnesota Press.

Taylor, Mark C.. 1984. Erring: A Postmodern A/Theology. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.

VanHuyssteen, Wentzel.1989.Theology and the Justification of Faith. Grand Rapids , Mich. : Eerdmans.

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite

Rights

Download

20

28

References

Share

Authors

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Identifiers

File Checksums (MD5)

Table of Contents

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite

Rights

Download

20

28

References

Share

Authors

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Identifiers

File Checksums (MD5)

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary