Skip to main content
  • News
  • Articles
  • About
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Policies
  • Log in
  • Register
  • News
  • Articles
  • About
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Policies
  • Log in
  • Register
Open navigation menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Start Submission
  • Author Guidelines
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Start Submission
  • Author Guidelines
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
Are Science and Religion in Conflict?
Research Articles
Are Science and Religion in Conflict?
Research Articles
Are Science and Religion in Conflict?

Abstract

The widely held legend of historical conflict between science and religion cannot be sustained on the basis of research. Different sciences show different relationships to religion; the physical sciences show rapprochement, whereas the human sciences often are antagonistic to religion. Reconciling science and religion by regarding each as applicable to a different domain is rejected in favor of seeing them as complementary perspectives on the same phenomena. The science and theology of human nature represents a fruitful arena for the development of this approach. A key general requirement is the epistemological reconciliation of science and religion.

Keywords

human sciences, reductionism, epistemology, complementary perspectives, conflict

How to Cite

Watts, F., (1997) “Are Science and Religion in Conflict?”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 32(1), 125–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.76997075

Rights

© 2024 The Author(s).

Downloads

Download PDF
Download XML

Share

Author

    • Fraser Watts
    • Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science

Downloads

  • Download PDF
  • Download XML

Issue

  • Volume 32 • Issue 1 • March 1997

Publication details

Pages 125–138
Published on 1997-03-02

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.76997075

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 7700a21248d21c25248b9e75ae3635bd
  • XML: c6dded13ef9a1664075dd4f1e85a1d4d

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 1467-9744 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |