Abstract
This paper explores the thesis that both modernism and postmodernism, as contemporary cultural phenomena, have been unable to come to terms with the issue of human rationality in any positive way. As a result of this, nearly all of the stereotyped ways of relating theology and science through models of conflict, independence, consonance, harmony, integration, or dialogue are likely to be revealed as too simplistic generalizations about the relationship between these two dominant forces in our culture. What is proposed is a postfoundationalist model where theology and science can rediscover the resources of rationality shared by these two reasoning strategies. Postfoundationalism in theology and science wants to point creatively beyond the confines of the local community, group, or culture toward a plausible form of interdisciplinary conversation. In taking seriously the role of local context and interpreted experience, postfoundationalism in theology and science should enable us to reach beyond the walls of our own communities in cross‐contextual, cross‐cultural and cross‐disciplinary conversation.
Keywords
tradition, postmodern science, naturalism, rationality, interdisciplinary dialogue, postfoundationalism
How to Cite
Van Huyssteen, J., (1997) “Should We Be Trying So Hard to Be Postmodern? A Response to Drees, Haught, and Yeager”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 32(4), 567–584. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00112