Skip to main content
  • News
  • Articles
  • About
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Policies
  • Log in
  • Register
  • News
  • Articles
  • About
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Policies
  • Log in
  • Register
Open navigation menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Start Submission
  • Author Guidelines
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Start Submission
  • Author Guidelines
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Nature: Theological and Philosophical Reflections
Research Articles
Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Nature: Theological and Philosophical Reflections
Research Articles
Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Nature: Theological and Philosophical Reflections

Abstract

I develop a multilevel, holistic view of persons, emphasizing embodiment, emotions, consciousness, and the social self. In successive sections I draw from six sources: 1. Theology. The biblical understanding of the unitary, embodied, social self gave way in classical Christianity to a body‐soul dualism, but it has been recovered by many recent theologians. 2. Neuroscience. Research has shown the localization of mental functions in regions of the brain, the interaction of cognition and emotion, and the importance of social interaction in evolutionary history and child development. 3. Artificial intelligence. Some forms of robotics use embodied systems that learn by interacting with their environment, but the possibilities for emotion, socialization, and consciousness in robots remain problematic. 4. Relations between levels. Concepts that can help us relate studies of neurons and persons include the hierarchy of levels, the communication of information, thebehavior of dynamic systems, and epistemological and ontological emergence. 5. Philosophy of mind. Two‐aspect theories of the mind‐brain relation offer an alternative between the extremes of eliminative materialism and the thesis that consciousness is irreducible. 6. Process philosophy. I suggest that process thought provides a coherent philosophical framework in which these themes can be brought together. It combines dipolar monism with organizational pluralism, and it emphasizes embodiment, emotions, a hierarchy oflevels, and the social character of selfhood.

How to Cite

Barbour, I., (1999) “Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Nature: Theological and Philosophical Reflections”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 34(3), 361–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00222

Rights

© 2024 The Author(s).

Downloads

Download PDF
Download XML

Share

Author

    • Ian G. Barbour
    • Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science

Downloads

  • Download PDF
  • Download XML

Issue

  • Volume 34 • Issue 3 • September 1999

Publication details

Pages 361–398
Published on 1999-09-02

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00222

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 3fa7314806092bd8f2ae56604e18f3c0
  • XML: 8b1941d3614df8d52d5302302ac6a412

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 1467-9744 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |