Skip to main content
  • News
  • Articles
  • About
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Policies
  • Log in
  • Register
  • News
  • Articles
  • About
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Policies
  • Log in
  • Register
Open navigation menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Start Submission
  • Author Guidelines
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Start Submission
  • Author Guidelines
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
Science and the Future of Theology: Critical Issues
Research Articles
Science and the Future of Theology: Critical Issues
Research Articles
Science and the Future of Theology: Critical Issues

Abstract

The ambivalent reputation of theology as an academic discipline is attributed to the often circular character of its procedures based on presumed authoritative sources. Recently, science too has come under the shadow of “postmodernist” critiques but, it is argued, has been able to withstand them successfully and make epistemologically warrantedclaims to be depicting reality—thereby vindicating human rationality. Evolutionary epistemological considerations also reinforce confidence in the more general deliverances of the human exploration of reasonableness through inference to the best explanation (IBE). The consequences of applying IBE, with its associated criteria, in theological investigation are considered in relation to theology as it is and as it might be. A number of issues critical for thedevelopment of a credible theology are identified. In spite of the challenging and somewhat negative view of contemporary theology to which this leads, hope is expressed that a genuinely credible “evangelical,”“catholic,” and liberal theology may yet emerge for the new millennium.

Keywords

evolutionary epistemology, relativism, critical issues (I–XIV), methodology, human environment, theology, postmodernism, rationality, scientific realism, authority, reasonableness, dissonance, “bridge” model, inference to the best explanation (IBE)

How to Cite

Peacocke, A., (2000) “Science and the Future of Theology: Critical Issues”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 35(1), 119–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00264

Rights

© 2024 The Author(s).

Downloads

Download PDF
Download XML

Share

Author

    • Arthur Peacocke
    • Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science

Downloads

  • Download PDF
  • Download XML

Issue

  • Volume 35 • Issue 1 • March 2000

Publication details

Pages 119–140
Published on 2000-03-02

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00264

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: b09e661a867ebf4e7b584a888c55f175
  • XML: 9bcdc1807819d7ecb30653f1c6703448

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 1467-9744 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |