Abstract
This is a theological response to two programmatic essays, “Science and the Future of Theology: Critical Issues,” by Arthur Peacocke and “What Game is Being Played? The Need for Clarity about theRelationship between Scientific and Theological Understanding,” by David A. Pailin. It argues that the two authors, well informed by the recent developments in science, are reduplicating some methodological and epistemological trends common to nineteenth‐century theology. The feasibility of their project should, therefore, be examined on whether they succeed in answering the questions posed to the liberal project that dominated theological and philosophical scholarship in the last century. They are found to be wanting in their inadequate response to three considerations: (1) the persistence of particular manifestations of religion and theology's enduring refusal to accept thoroughly scientific “enlightened” criteria, (2) the epistemological implications of the eschatological character of the Christianmessage, and (3) the trinitarian paradigm for Christian theology and the life of faith.
Keywords
epistemological break, death of God, nineteenth‐century theology, ultimacy, eschatology, episteme, Trinity
How to Cite
Westhelle, V., (2000) “Theological Shamelessness? A Response to Arthur Peacocke and David A. Pailin”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 35(1), 165–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00266