Skip to main content
  • News
  • Articles
  • About
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Policies
  • Log in
  • Register
  • News
  • Articles
  • About
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Policies
  • Log in
  • Register
Open navigation menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Start Submission
  • Author Guidelines
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Start Submission
  • Author Guidelines
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
Theology: Reduction or Autonomy?
Research Articles
Theology: Reduction or Autonomy?
Research Articles
Theology: Reduction or Autonomy?

Abstract

Issues of the nature and task of theology remain important to the science‐theology dialogue. This paper lays out a framework for understanding the nature of theology in relation to the other sciences. In particular, I argue that the primary question remains one of autonomy and reduction. If theology is a genuine academic discipline, then it should be an autonomous field with its own subject matter and norms. Wolfhart Pannenberg argues that theology is the science of God, but I suggest that theology be more broadly understood as the science of meaning. If we recognize this, the modes of interaction between theology and the other sciences becomes clearer.

Keywords

reductionism, science‐theology conflict, theological method, scientific theology, science‐theology typologies

How to Cite

Peterson, G., (2001) “Theology: Reduction or Autonomy?”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 36(4), 597–614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00387

Rights

© 2024 The Author(s).

Downloads

Download PDF
View PDF
Download XML

Share

Author

    • Gregory R. Peterson
    • Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science

Downloads

  • Download PDF
  • View PDF
  • Download XML

Issue

  • Volume 36 • Issue 4 • December 2001

Publication details

Pages 597–614
Published on 2001-12-02

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00387

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: ec37a1df602045aef7172dfbb27b5796
  • XML: 695ffccc6d6af44936aaab14f46eaa34

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 1467-9744 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |