Abstract
The anthropic principle, that the universe exists in some sense for life, has persisted in recent religious and scientific thought because it derives from cosmological fact. It has been unsuccessful in furthering our understanding of the world because its advocates tend to impose final metaphysical solutions onto what is a physical problem. We begin by outlining the weak and strong versions of the anthropic principle and reviewing the discoveries that have led to their formulation. We present the reasons some have given for ignoring the anthropic implications of these discoveries and find these reasons wanting—a real phenomenon demands real investigation. Theological and scientific solutions of the problem are then considered and criticized; these solutions provide dead ends for explanation. Finally, we pursue the path that explanation must follow and look at the physical details of the problem. It seems clear that the anthropic principle has been poorly framed. Removing the ambiguities surrounding the meaning of “life” may lead to more profitable investigations.
Keywords
meaning of life, existence of God, anthropic principle, many–universe theory, self–organized criticality
How to Cite
Sharpe, K. & Walgate, J., (2002) “The Anthropic Principle: Life in the Universe”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 37(4), 925–939. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9744.00465