The version of religious naturalism sketched here is called naturism to distinguish it from conceptions of religious naturalism that make fundamental appeal to some idea of deity, deities, or the divine, however immanental, functional, nonontological, or purely valuational or existential such notions may be claimed to be. The focus of naturism is on nature itself as both metaphysically and religiously ultimate. Nature is sacred in its own right, not because of its derivation from some more–ultimate religious principle, state, being, beings, or order of being. Humans, their cultures, and their histories are conceived as integral parts of nature, manifestations of potentialities that lie within it and have been actualized by biological evolution. While there is no purpose of nature, the natural order contains beings capable of purposive behavior. With this purposive behavior, and the goals and ideals implicit in it, humans have the capacity to give significant direction to their ongoing cultural evolution and to discover and maintain their appropriate place within the community of creatures.
natural sciences, humans as integral parts of nature, purpose, natura naturata, chance, religious ultimacy of nature, purposive behavior, gods, biological evolution, cosmic epochs, novelty, nature, God, freedom, natura naturans, cultural evolution
Crosby, D., (2003) “Naturism as a Form of Religious Naturalism”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 38(1), 117–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9744.00484
Views
Downloads
Bergson, Henri. 1919. Creative Evolution. Trans. ArthurMitchell. London : Macmillan.
Crosby, Donald A.2002. A Religion of Nature. Albany : State Univ. of New York Press.
Stone, Jerome. 2003. Varieties of Religious Naturalism. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science (March): 111–15.
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1978. Process and Reality: Corrected Edition. Ed. David RayGriffin and Donald W.Sherburne. New York : Free Press.