Emergent Monism and the Classical Doctrine of the Soul

Joseph A. Bracken; Joseph A. Bracken

doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2004.00564.x

Abstract

Traditional Christian belief in the existence of human life after death within a transformed material universe should be capable of rational justification if one chooses carefully the philosophical scheme underlying those claims. One should not have to appeal simply to the power of a loving God to justify one's beliefs. A revision of Whitehead's metaphysical scheme is proposed that allows one to render these classical Christian beliefs at least plausible to a broad range of contemporary thinkers as a consequence of a cosmology based on the principle of universal intersubjectivity and the need for a common ground between opposing subjectivities.

Keywords

field, actual occasion, matter/spirit dichotomy, God‐world relationship, intersubjectivity, soul/body relation, (Whiteheadian) societies

How to Cite

Bracken, J., (2004) “Emergent Monism and the Classical Doctrine of the Soul”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 39(1), 161–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2004.00564.x

Rights

Download

References

Aquinas, Thomas. 1951. Summa Theologiae. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.

Bracken, Joseph A., S.J.1994. “Proposals for Overcoming the Atomism within Process‐Relational Metaphysics.”Process Studies 23: 10–24, esp. 16–17.

——. 2001. The One in the Many: A Contemporary Reconstruction of the God‐World Relationship. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans.

Brown, Warren, NanceyMurphy, and H. NewtonMalony, eds. 1998. Whatever Happened to the Soul? Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature. Minneapolis: Fortress.

Buber, Martin. 1970. I and Thou. Trans. WalterKaufmann. New York: Scribner's.

Clayton, Philip. 1997. God and Contemporary Science. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans.

Desmond, William. 1995. Being and the Between. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.

Laszlo, Ervin. 1972. Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Towards a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought. New York: Gordon and Breach.

Leibniz, G. W.1898. The Monadology. In Leibniz: The Monadology and Other Philosophical Writings, trans. RobertLatta. London: Oxford Univ. Press.

Polkinghorne, John. 2002. The God of Hope and the End of the World. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.

Suchocki, Marjorie. 1988. The End of Evil: Process Eschatology in Historical Context. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.

Tanner, Kathryn. 2000. “Eschatology without a Future?” In The End of the World and the Ends of God: Science and Theology on Eschatology, ed. JohnPolkinghorne and MichaelWelker, 222–37. Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity International.

Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. 1965. The Phenomenon of Man. Trans. BernardWall. New York: Harper Torchbook.

Volf, Miroslav. 2000. “Enter into Joy! Sin, Death, and the Life of the World to Come.” In The End of the World and the Ends of God: Science and Theology on Eschatology, ed. JohnPolkinghorne and MichaelWelker, 256–78. Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity International.

Whitehead, Alfred North. 1967. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Free Press.

——. 1978. Process and Reality. Corrected ed., ed. David RayGriffin and Donald W.Sherburne. New York: Free Press.

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite

Rights

Download

20

32

2

References

Share

Authors

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Identifiers

File Checksums (MD5)

Table of Contents

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite

Rights

Download

20

32

2

References

Share

Authors

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Identifiers

File Checksums (MD5)

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary