Notes

  1. . E. Lewis, The Creator and the Adversary (New York: Abingdon‐Cokesbury Press, 1948).
  2. . R. Niebuhr, The Self and the Dramas of History (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1955), p. 18 ff.
  3. . E. S. Brightman, The Finding of God (New York: Abingdon‐Cokesbury Press, 193l), p. 186.
  4. . K. Barth, Church Dogmatics (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1960), Part 111, chap. i, 108; Part 111, chap. iv, 366.
  5. . J. R. Platt, The Step to Man (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966), p. 146. Treatments of such steady‐state systems in which there is a net process taking place inside the system or between the system and its surroundings are properly treated by irreversible thermodynamics.
  6. . A. E.Emerson, “Dynamic Homeostasis: A Unifying Principle in Organic, Social and Ethical Evolution,” Scientific Monthly  , LXXVIII (1954), 67. Emerson applies to social systems the term which Cannon emphasized for physiology in The Wisdom of the Body (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1932). (Emerson's paper is reprinted with minor changes in this issue of Zygon.–Ed.)
  7. . J. M.Burgers, “Curiosity and Play: Basic Factors in the Development of Life,” Science  , CLIV (1966), 1680.
  8. . F. L.Lambert, “Chaos, Entropy, and Original Sin,” Religion in Life  , XXXVI (1967), 259.
  9. . P. Tillich, Systematic Theology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963), 111, 102. His demonic is usually a process phenomenon, not a state, e.g., an individual who has risen to a level of complexity and then drops down to a lesser state.