DIVINE AGENCY AND THE PRINCIPLE OF THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY

Robert Larmer; Robert Larmer

doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.01015.x

Abstract

Many contemporary thinkers seeking to integrate theistic belief and scientific thought reject what they regard as two extremes. They disavow deism in which God is understood simply to uphold the existence of the physical universe, and they exclude any view of divine influence that suggests the performance of physical work through an immaterial cause. Deism is viewed as theologically inadequate, and acceptance of direct immaterial causation of physical events is viewed as scientifically illegitimate. This desire to avoid both deism and any positing of God as directly intervening in the physical order has led to models of divine agency that seek to defend the reality of divine causal power yet affirm the causal closure of the physical. I argue, negatively, that such models are unsuccessful in their attempts to affirm both the reality of divine causal power acting in the created world and the causal closure of the physical and, positively, that the assumption that underlies these models, namely that any genuine integration of theistic and scientific belief must posit the causal closure of the physical on pain of violating well‐established conservation principles, is mistaken.

Keywords

Arthur Peacocke, supervenience, top‐down causality, Thomas Tracy, quantum indeterminacy, panentheism, John Polkinghorne, divine agency, theism, conservation of energy, chaos, Nancey Murphy

How to Cite

Larmer, R., (2009) “DIVINE AGENCY AND THE PRINCIPLE OF THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 44(3), 543–557. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.01015.x

Rights

Download

References

Ducasse, Curt. 1951. Nature, Mind, and Death. La Salle , Ill. : Open Court.

Farrer, Austin. 1967. Faith and Speculation. London : Adam and Charles Black.

Holmes, Arthur. 1987. “Why God Cannot Act ”. In Process Theology, ed. Ronald H.Nash, 177–96. Grand Rapids , Mich. : Baker.

Kim, Jaegwon. 1998. Philosophy of Mind. Boulder , Colo. : Westview.

Koperski, Jeffrey. 2000. “God, Chaos and the Quantum Dice. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 35:545–59.

Larmer, Robert. 1988. Water Into Wine? An Examination of the Concept of Miracle. Montreal : McGill‐Queen's Univ. Press.

Lewis, C. S.. 1947. Miracles: A Preliminary Study. London : Geoffrey Bles Ltd.

Murphy, Nancey. 1995. “Divine Action in the Natural Order: Buridan's Ass and Schrödinger's Cat ”. In Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. RobertJohn Russell, NanceyMurphy, and ArthurPeacocke, 325–58. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory Foundation, and Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Osborn, Lawrence. 1999. “Theology and the New Physics ”. In God, Humanity and the Cosmos, ed. ChristopherSouthgate, 95–136. Harrisburg , Pa. : Trinity Press International.

Peacocke, Arthur. 1990. Theology for a Scientific Age. Oxford : Blackwell.

Polkinghorne, John. 1998. Belief in God in an Age of Science. New Haven : Yale Univ. Press.

Smith, Quentin, and WilliamLane Craig. [1993] 1995. Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford : Clarendon.

Stoeger, William. 1995. “Describing God's Action in the World in Light of Scientific Knowledge of Reality ”. In Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. RobertJohn Russell, NanceyMurphy, and ArthurPeacocke, 239–61. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory Foundation, and Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Tracy, Thomas. 1995. “Particular Providence and the God of the Gaps ”. In Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. RobertJohn Russell, NanceyMurphy, and ArthurPeacocke, 289–324. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory Foundation, and Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Wildman, Wesley, and RobertRussell. 1995. “Chaos: A Mathematical Introduction with Philosophical Reflections ”. In Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. RobertJohn Russell, NanceyMurphy, and ArthurPeacocke, 49–90. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory Foundation, and Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite

Rights

Download

24

30

4

References

Share

Authors

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Identifiers

File Checksums (MD5)

Table of Contents

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite

Rights

Download

24

30

4

References

Share

Authors

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Identifiers

File Checksums (MD5)

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary