Bohm, David. 1980. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Bryant, Christopher. 1983. Jung and the Christian Way. London : Darton, Longman and Todd.

Clayton, Philip. 1997. God and Contemporary Science. Edinburgh : Edinburgh Univ. Press.

Clayton, Philip. 2000. “On the Value of the Panentheistic Analogy: A Response to Willem Drees. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  35:699–704.

Clayton, Philip, and ArthurPeacocke. 2003. In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God's Presence in a Scientific World. Grand Rapids , Mich. : Eerdmans.

Drees, Willem B.. 1996. Religion, Science and Naturalism. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Drees, Willem B.. 2000. “Thick Naturalism: Comments on Zygon 2000. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  35:849–60.

Griffin, David Ray. 2001. “Process Philosophy of Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion  50:131–51.

Hardwick, Charley. 1996. Events of Grace: Naturalism, Existentialism, and Theology. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Jung, C. G.. 1959. Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Sky. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Knight, Christopher C.. 2001. Wrestling with the Divine: Religion, Science, and Revelation. Minneapolis : Fortress.

Knight, Christopher C.. 2003. “Theistic Naturalism and the Word Made Flesh: Complementary Approaches to the Debate on Panentheism  ”. In PhilipClayton and ArthurPeacocke, In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God's Presence in a Scientific World, 48–61. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans.

Knight, Christopher C.. 2007a. “Emergence, Naturalism, and Panentheism: An Eastern Christian Perspective  ”. In Arthur R.Peacocke, All That Is: A Naturalistic Faith for the Twenty‐First Century: A Theological Proposal with Responses from Leading Figures in the Science‐Religion Dialogue, ed. PhilipClayton, 81–92. Minneapolis : Fortress.

Knight, Christopher C.. 2007b. The God of Nature: Incarnation and Contemporary Science. Minneapolis : Fortress.

Peacocke, Arthur R.. 1993. Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming—Natural, Human and Divine. Enlarged ed. London : SCM.

Peacocke, Arthur R.. 1995. “God's Interaction with the World: The Implications of Deterministic ‘Chaos’ and of Interconnected and Interdependent Complexity  ”. In Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Robert J.Russell, NanceyMurphy, and Arthur R.Peacocke, 263–87. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory.

Peacocke, Arthur R.. 2007. All That Is: A Naturalistic Faith for the Twenty‐First Century: A Theological Proposal with Responses from Leading Figures in the Science‐Religion Dialogue. ed. PhilipClayton. Minneapolis : Fortress.

Polkinghorne, John. 1986. One World: The Interaction of Science and Theology. London : SPCK.

Polkinghorne, John. 1994. Science and Christian Belief: Theological Reflections of a Bottom‐Up Thinker. London : SPCK.

Polkinghorne, John. 1996. Scientists as Theologians: A Comparison of the Writings of Ian Barbour, Arthur Peacocke and John Polkinghorne. London : SPCK.

Rahner, Karl. 1963. Studies in Modern Theology. Heidelberg : Herder, and London : Burns and Oates.