EMBODIED SCIENCE: RECENTERING RELIGION‐AND‐SCIENCE

Philip Hefner; Philip Hefner

doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01071.x

Abstract

Neither religion nor science is first of all a realm of pure ideas, even though religion‐and‐science discussions often assume that they are. I propose that a concept of embodied science is more adequate and that religion‐and‐science should center its attention on science as enabler for improving the world (SEIW). This idea of science is rooted in Jerome Ravetz's concept of industrialized science and Donna Haraway's technoscience. SEIW describes the sociocultural context of science in commercial, government, and university settings. The chief focus of religion‐and‐science consequently takes into account five basic issues: (1) the kind of world we want, (2) liberating science, (3) human action and ethics, (4) religion and the world's possibilities, and (5) recovering myth. An underlying presupposition of the discussion is that understanding the world always involves as well an understanding of our being‐in‐the‐world.

Keywords

religion‐and‐science, embodied science, SEIW, Jerome Ravetz, possibility, Donna Haraway, technology

How to Cite

Hefner, P., (2010) “EMBODIED SCIENCE: RECENTERING RELIGION‐AND‐SCIENCE”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 45(1), 251–263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01071.x

Rights

Download

References

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1991. “Consciousness for the Twenty‐First Century.Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 26:7–26.

Edel, Abraham. [1955] 1995. Ethical Judgment: The Use of Science in Ethics. Piscataway , N.J. : Transaction.

Goldman, Steven. 1990. “Philosophy, Engineering, and Western Culture. ” In Broad and Narrow Interpretations of Philosophy of Technology, ed. PaulDurbin, 125–52. Boston : Kluwer Academic.

Goodenough, Ursula. 2000. “Reflections on Science and Technology.Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 35:5–12.

Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. New York : Routledge.

Hefner, Philip. 2003. “Nature Good and Evil: A Theological Palette. ” In Is Nature Ever Evil?: Religion, Science and Value, ed. Willem B.Drees, 189–202. London : Routledge.

Hefner, Philip. 2006. “Religion‐and‐Science. ” In The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, ed. PhilipClayton and ZacharySimpson, 562–76. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.

Hefner, Philip. 2008. Religion‐and‐Science as Spiritual Quest for Meaning. Ed. Carl S.Helrich. Kitchener , Ont. : Pandora.

Jonas, Hans. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.

Moltmann, Jürgen. 1965. Theology of Hope: On the Ground and the Implications of a Christian Eschatology. New York : Harper and Row.

Nakayama, Shigeru. 1990. “Human Rights and the Structure of the Scientific Enterprise. ” In Human Rights and Scientific and Technological Development: Studies on the Affirmative Use of Science and Technology for the Furtherance of Human Rights, ed. C. G.Weeramantry, 137–50. Tokyo : United Nations Univ. Press.

Pannenberg, Wolfhart. 1969. Theology and the Kingdom of God. Nashville : Westminster John Knox.

Peters, Ted. 2000. God—The World's Future. Minneapolis : Fortress.

Ravetz, Jerome R.1971. Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.

Wiener, Norbert. 1966. God & Golem, Inc.: A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion. Cambridge : MIT Press.

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite

Rights

Download

22

25

7

References

Share

Authors

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Identifiers

File Checksums (MD5)

Table of Contents

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite

Rights

Download

22

25

7

References

Share

Authors

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Identifiers

File Checksums (MD5)

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary