Notes

  1. . P. H. McDonald, Cybernetics and Theology, A Guide to Dialogue between Science and Religion 1967, p. 47. This paper is part of a collection of documents compiled by the Study‐Research Group on Science and Theology at the conclusion of the Experimental Study of Religion and Society at North Carolina State University.
  2. . Michael Polanyi, Science, Faith and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964), p. 31.
  3. . Stephen Toulmin, Foresight and Understanding (New York: Harper & Row, 1961), D. 101.
  4. . Loren Eiseley, The Firmament of Time (New York: Atheneum Publishers, 1969), p. 11.
  5. . Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 122.
  6. . Toulmin, p. 115.
  7. . Robert N.Bellah, “Christianity and Symbolic Realism,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion  9 (1970): 95.
  8. . Herbert Fingarette, The Self in Transformation (New York: Basic Books, 1963), p. 22.
  9. . Kuhn, pp. 117 ff.
  10. . Reinhold Niebuhr, The Nature and Destiny of Man (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1964), p. 182.
  11. . Toulmin, p. 115.
  12. . Kuhn, pp. 143–58. This chapter articulates the process by which a new scientific paradigm comes to be accepted by the community of scientists.
  13. . H. Richard Niebuhr, The Responsible Self (New York: Harper & Row, 1963), pp. 61–65.
  14. . For a broader development of the conclusion see Charles Hartshorne's The Logic of Perfection (LaSalle, III.: Open Court Publishing Co., 1962); Schubert Ogden, The Reality of God (New York: Harper & Row, 1966).