Quantum Fundamentalism and Theological Liberty . . . . . . . . . . . Mark Harris	593
The Soul of the Frog for a Postmodern Age: Updating a Classic Debate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gordon L. Miller	609
Scientific Methods and Sacred Matters: On Methodological Naturalism, Divine Agency, and Christians in Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mitchell Mallary	638

RELIGIOUS ROBOTS: AI AS RELIGIOUS SUBJECT AND OBJECT

From Angels to Artificial Agents? AI as a Mirror for Human (Im)perfections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pim Haselager	661
Spiritual Conversation with a Companion Machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fraser Watts and Yorick Alexander Wilks	676
What Is the Afterlife Like for Robots? An Experimental Eschatological Sneak Peek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Max Tretter	692
Religion and the Android . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . William F. Clocksin	717
Religion among Robots: An If/When of Future Machine Intelligence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robert M. Geraci	729
Are Religious Machines Possible? Embodied Cognition, AI, and Religious Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Daekyung Jung	748
Could Robots Become Religious? Theological, Evolutionary, and Cognitive Perspectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marius Dorobantu	768

SCHAEFER’S WILD EXPERIMENT

Science and Technology Studies and Affect in the Wild . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mathew Arthur	788
Cultivating Calm Passions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Anne Pollock	800
Kuhn, Conspiracy Theories, and Scientific Progress . . . . . . . . Josh A. Reeves	811
Love Affair with an Idea: Commentary on Wild Experiment: Feeling Science and Secularism after Darwin by Donovan Schaefer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Esha Shah	825
Changing Minds: Cogency Theory and Secular Bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mari van Emmerik	839
“They Made up Quiet Songs”: Classification, Feeling, and Technique in Science and Religion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Donovan O. Schaefer	850

Good Fences Make Engaging Neighbors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dirk Evers	871
Theology and Policing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . King-Ho Leung	884
Empirical Realities? A Question of Basic Principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robyn Boeré	893
Considering the Place of Apophaticism within Science-Engaged Theology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mikael Leidenhag	901
Replies to Some of Our Friendlier Critics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . John Perry and Joanna Leidenhag	912